in

EXCLUSIVE: Biden ‘Ministry Of Truth’ Continues IN SECRET | Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar

Krystal and Saagar interview The Intercept journalist Ken Klippenstein about his exclusive scoop documenting secret efforts by the Department of Homeland Security to control information flows online

To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show uncut and 1 hour early visit: https://breakingpoints.supercast.com/

To listen to Breaking Points as a podcast, check them out on Apple and Spotify

Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/breaking-points-with-krystal-and-saagar/id1570045623

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4Kbsy61zJSzPxNZZ3PKbXl

Merch: https://breaking-points.myshopify.com/

Ken Klippenstein: https://theintercept.com/2022/10/31/social-media-disinformation-dhs/

Written by Breaking Points

Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. Lots of people "knew" this was going on, but it is good to see proof. If this goes unpunished we are pretty much screwed and it likely will go unpunished so I guess we are screwed. I don't trust the press to push this as hard as they should.

  2. Makes me feel good our federal law enforcement has time to monitor this dangerous speech on the internet…must mean nobody is trying to physically harm the citizens of our country anymore!

  3. And right when the Senate releases their investigation that says the "disinformation" of lab leak theory is the most likely origin. This was misinformation just a year ago and had you banned from twitter, youtube, etc… so all the blacked out pfizer documents will be disinformation in a little bit since Big Pharma is in charge of both our politics and mainstream media.

  4. Knew they were doing it before they announced the thing. Knew they’d continue afterward. The only reason they announced it at all was to test the public appetite for it, and found that while it still isn’t a majority of the population who will go along with this authoritarianism, a great many more than would have ten years ago and far many more than twenty years ago are now open to the tyranny they wish to implement. And THAT is one of the two actual stories here. Not whether they are doing it, but how many Americans are okay with it and whether or not they will be punished and removed from power for being domestic enemies of the Constitution.

  5. The "foreign actor" argument should always be met with a huge dose of skepticism. It's been given too much credibility already. During both the "Russian hack" (2016 election) and the incident with Hunter's laptop, there were people who either admitted that the information was accurate, or at least conceded to the point that it may be accurate, yet still called it disinformation based on it's alleged foreign origin and advocated for its censorship. Imagine thinking that banning politically inconvenient information on the grounds that it's part of an attack by foreign enemies is a good way to protect democracy.

  6. Nobody is surprised at this. Everyone SHOULD know and understand that the deep state WILL continue to use these private social media companies as a tool to make an end run around constitutional restrictions on what government is allowed to do and not do. And the private companies are more than happy to oblige because as he says, this ingratiates them with the government and practically guarantees they'll be untouchable as long as they do their masters bidding. Anyone who thinks this is just Democrats is flat stupid. This will continue under Republican leadership as well. The entire deep state needs to be gutted. All of it. Or we'll all be enslaved by the conglomeration of evil that is Big Tech and Government.

  7. There's at least 10% of people who are partially or completely insane, yet they vote and elections are often won by a much smaller margin. It is simply obvious that oligarchy is the only viable system. What is immoral is not the oligarchies creating nanny states for us idiots, but pretending and lying to us that we live in democracies. The feudal system was more honest as kings, lords and cardinals never pretended that peasants and slaves have any say.

  8. For decades the truth has been whatever the political cabal of bureaucracy and political appointees said that it was…

    Regardless of the facts, details and evidence.

    This has been the pivotal basis for abuse of power and authority without truly using the full force of the government in outright corruption and skullduggery…

    For example the fabrication processes involved in the manufacturing of Weapons of Mass Destruction evidence and then using the reputation of the Secretary of State and former four star general to sell the misinformation and misrepresentation…
    They only had to sell it to him…
    In order for him to sell it to the world…
    He had doubts about it…
    But he was no longer involved as a four star general protected by the intelligence community and fed vetted accurate information…
    He was a political appointee surrounded by political appointees many of whom were professional liars before he had his first star.
    He believed the lies and that allowed him to sell the lies…
    Without censorship and control over the truth…
    They find it much more difficult to…
    “Wag the Dog”…
    That is why the suppression of journalists is rampant…
    That is why the game is changing regarding news media and journalism…
    The destruction of the honest truth reporting and deliberate misinformation propaganda campaigns are routinely the very same thing.
    It’s about control and controlling the narratives.

  9. You both have to stop leaning left. Every show is slanted left. Please please please find the center. This stuff is EXACTLY why you need to stop giving the left the extra benefit of the doubt

  10. Isn't it weird how everything our government does is done by unaccountable, unknown bureaucrats? We should give them a name. Shallow Province? No, that's no good. Wading Parish? No, that's not it either. Deep State?

  11. There is no definitive definition of "disinformation" or "misinformation". Just because you don't like what someone is saying doesn't make it "disinformation" or "misinformation".

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0