Florida, no childhood vaccinations

Free PDFs of my two text books, direct link for downloads,

Physiology book in hard copy

0:00 start
1:25 it is essential that health care practitioners review all data
1:45 to evaluate risk and benefits, unique to each patient
2:11 when determining what health care services to provide,
2:37 including the administration of covid-19 vaccines
2:53 these decisions should be made on an individual basis (Topic on providing unique care according to individual needs)
3:15 risk of administering a covid-19 vaccine to healthy children may outweigh the benefits
3:25 Healthy children aged 5 to 17 may not benefit from receiving the currently available COVID-19 vaccine
3:39 children with underlying conditions are the best candidates for the COVID-19 vaccine
Looking at the evidence
4:00 risk that may outweigh benefits among healthy children with no underlying conditions
4:12 limited risk of severe illness due to COVID-19
5:00 Keynotes: Paper was used in Delta times, you ideally want something more current. The following are points true according to delta times
5:34 Although Covid-19 is generally milder in children than adults
5:39 severe illness and long-term complications, including multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), can occur after primary infection
6:11 Evaluation of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in children 5 to 11 years of AGE (NEJM)
8:42 argument: There is high prevalence of existing immunity among children
11:18 The absence of data informing benefit of COVID-19 vaccination among children with existing immunity (agrees with the Florida study)
12:19 in clinical trials, higher than anticipated serious adverse events occurred among those receiving the covid-19 vaccine. (reference unclear to this claim)
14:43 Reduced vaccine efficacy in with omicron, Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine among children 5-11 and 12-17 years in New York after the Emergence of the Omicron Variant
16:27 the effectiveness against cases of BNT162b2 declined rapidly for children, particularly those 5-11
16:48 However, vaccination of children 5-11 years was protective against severe disease and is recommended
17:53 Risk of myocarditis due to the COVID-19 vaccine, Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021 (JAMA, 2022)
20:19 Vaccine efficacy wanes rapidly (the percentage drop shown for children and adolescents)
21:40 Recommended for children with underlying health conditions or comorbidities
22:08 in general, healthy children with no significant underlying health conditions under 16 years old are at little to no risk of severe illness complications from covid-19, For adolescents, the risk of myocarditis du


Children with underlying conditions are the best candidates for the COVID-19 vaccine.

Evaluation of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in Children 5 to 11 Years of Age (NEJM)

(Delta time data)

Evaluation of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in Children 5 to 11 Years of Age (NEJM)

N = 2,268, (phase 2 clinical trial)

NIH covid SeroHub

Reduced vaccine efficacy in with omicron

Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine among children 5-11 and 12-17 years in New York after the Emergence of the Omicron Variant

New York State Department of Health

December 13, 2021 to January 30, 2022

Aged 12 – 17, n = 852,384 fully-vaccinated

Aged, 5 – 11 years, n = 365,502 fully-vaccinated

Risk of myocarditis due to the COVID-19 vaccine

Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021(JAMA, 2022)

(70.7 per million doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine)

in adolescent males aged 16 to 17 years

(105.9 per million doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine)

in young men aged 18 to 24 years

(52.4 per million doses of BNT162b2)

(56.3 per million doses of
mRNA-1273 )

Written by Dr. John Campbell

Hello Everyone,My name is John Campbell and I am a retired Nurse Teacher and A and E nurse based in England. I also do some teaching in Asia and Africa when time permits. These videos are to help students to learn the background to all forms of health care. My PhD focused on the development of open learning resources for nurses nationally and internationally.


Leave a Reply
  1. I'm not sure about any if these studies you mention, Dr Campbell. Studies can be found everywhere which refute conclusions that natural immunity is necessarily as good as or even better than vaccination in reducing illnesses. As to Florida – about the highest Covid death toll in the world?

  2. I'm surprised, Dr Campbell, that you seem to be joining the side of Dr Malone and Joe Rogan and misrepresenting the data on childhood Covid illnesses and deaths in relation to natural infection and vaccination. You must be aware of how politicized the pandemic in Florida has become. I'm disappointed. Most data will refute your conclusions.

  3. I used to respect you, Dr Camobell, and followed your sometimes excellent, evidence-driven reporting on the latest global Covid data, but I fear something has gone horribly wrong and that you have been, unaccountably, 'captured by certain political and dangerous influences such as The Great Barrington Declaration. Controversy and dissenting viewpoints in science are fine, but you are falling into the trap of selecting data to suit a theory, rather, as it should be, the other way around.

  4. There seems to have been a massive and possibly criminal attempt to make sure we don't have access to the data needed to do a proper risk / benefit analysis for covid shots.

    The fact that MRNA shots are new and skipped years of testing is reason enough for caution.

    But… their shady behavior makes me want that stuff nowhere near my children.

    I'm still suffering side effects from my MRNA shots long after their apparent benefits expired.



    It's the PRE-AMBLE STUPID.


  6. My question would be that if my 9 yr old had had covid in April 2020 and then again in sept 2021, and has (other than a bit of a temp and feeling "not good" first time round and then second time round just had cold like symptoms), proven she is unlikely to have severe adverse disease to covid is there any point her having the vax? Would it still make it less likely she would bring it home and infect the adults in her life? Some of whom are shielding or who have had severe disease from previous covid infections

  7. Nice to hear I’m not crazy. I think it’s a pretty safe argument that vaccinating kids is more dangerous than them getting Covid (unless they have co-morbidities). There’s going to be a reckoning with these vaccines for our children’s generation.

  8. John, I like the way you say that we need to leave Delta thinking behind and enter into Omicron thinking. I'll go one step further and say we should enter into Omega thinking. In Greek, Omicron means little o and Omega means Big O and also means THE END. I know that because I was in a sorority that was called Alpha Chi Omega which means- Beginning and End. Sometimes science can be poetic and we began with Alpha and we have ended with Omega and the scientific Community has to wake up and see the change and move with the change. 🌊 I do applaud Florida and I hope other states look🕵 at what they have said and watch👁👁 them and follow suit.
    IT'S sad to see that our brothers across the sea- the English- are following their little brother America. WHI, I ask u, listens to what their LITTLE brother says IF they are the BIG brother? IT JUST leads to trouble! THEY should look at Florida which is the ONLY little brother that actually has implemented a reaction to the change from alpha to omega– beginning and end 🔚MY research — reading thousands of pages– began AFTER I FIRST started watching YOUR channel. It told me that historically nature begins with a big punch and moves up and then moves down –just as YOU over time wisely predicted. [WITH one bump when a commenter said u were wrong & u capitulated & then I IMMEDIATELY showed the flaw in his logic & asked u to reinstate your prediction of covid's tragetory over time.
    Unfortunately u did NOT CORRECT your revised statement– preferring to listen to the male vs the female. It happens🙉]
    As everyone knows– nature NEVER stays in a straight line-vertical⬆ or ➡horizontal- unless YOU'RE dead and you flatlne➡. Beware of 🙈🙉🙊➡👽
    SO if anyone including England is following LITTLE brother America they are flatlining, which means death in Medical parlance. Y'ALL in England NEED to write your government and tell them they're making a very BIG mistake. ( I researched that as well in THE GREAT INFLUENZA by John Barry, 2004.)
    IT is obviously a linguistic manipulation controlled by a narrative manipulation which is being overseen by a🤑 Machiavellian technique used by High Machs. In short u r being 🤥to. I researched that psychological maneuver also and it makes complete sense😉
    English was my major in college and so I pay attention to language. THE first thing I do is look up the words and see their roots. MANIPULATION of course comes from the word for ✋ and it's the movement of the hands👐🙌👏. I would say this is a shell🙅 game being played by the government & medical hierarchy. 2 years in, I REALLY don't think the PEOPLE should fall for the shell 🙅game👉👈 anymore, especially if it means sacrificing💀 THEIR 👼children: the ONLY ones who have–
    NO voice NO agency NO power👫👬👯

  9. Leslie H…. I am glad you are enjoying the freedoms of Florida. Texas, my state, has been open for over a year now, and I know there are several other states which are enjoying their freedom. It's nice to live in a free state.
    Thank you, Dr. Campbell for all your info.

  10. An example of how this guy is misinterpreting (or flat out ignoring terms he doesn't know and inserting his own details) the papers … he characterizes the myocarditis paper as having 1626 people that "actually had myocarditis" while ignoring the words "national passive reporting system" right below that value … that means INDIVIDUALS were anonymously reporting that they "had myocarditis". As we know, someone just saying something doesn't make it true, and that's why VAERS data is taken with a huge grain of salt … because it doesn't come from our (hospital, office) data or from an actual clinical trial or Metadata analysis.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.