in

Israeli Study Shows Negligible Protection of Pfizer Vaccine Against Viral Transmission

Join The Conversation! | https://trialsitenews.com/
Israeli researchers, represented by corresponding author Naama M. Kopelman from Holon Institute of Technology, Department of Computer Science, and scientists from the clinical microbiology and epidemiology departments in Sheba Medical Center conducted a retrospective study combining population-wide national vaccination data along with Ct data derived from four major Israeli laboratories conducting SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests in a bid to measure not only vaccine effectiveness (e.g. usually measured by protection from infection, clinical disease or death) but also the potential risk of transmission given infection. This latter element, however, often neglected during COVID-19, represents a serious topic for public health policy concern and the reduction of viral spread. In this study, the impressive team of scientists investigated the important measurement of risk of transmission given infection by factoring the viral load, which negatively correlates in testing with cycle threshold (Ct) values in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). A readily available surrogate to estimate infectiousness—the Ct values associated with the SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests were the basis for this retrospective study comparing Ct levels of individuals in Israel vaccinated with 2, 3, or 4 doses versus COVID-19 recovered individuals. The findings reported are troubling. With acknowledged limitations aside, the findings raise imminent questions about any booster dose campaigns moving forward. With an emphasis on the mRNA vaccine produced by Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), the team reports that whether it’s the 2-dose primary series, 3rd dose booster (during Delta or Omicron), or the 4th dose for elderly and at risk, the duration of benefit as considered in protection against viral transmission is short-lived. Given the enormous public expenditure, this performance calls for the need to reassess the future of booster campaigns.

Written by TrialSite News

Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. Reference to paper missing. And what was the time interval in the PCR ct value comparisons.? Viral load would be different on Days 1,2,3 etc of infection… initially increasing then decaying… and was the Elisa calibration consistent across those 4 labs? Not a lot of critique on the study design to demonstrate what ordinary observation has shown.

  2. The last super, duper "special" OJ Surgeon I worked for, committed 90 million dollars in surgical Ins Fraud. It was more, or less the exact same financial scheme. Misdiagnosed Patients for Specific High Value Billable Surgeries that they really didn't medically need. The Ins Reimbursement was also a Financial Fraud for a surgery of very minimal time. This couple fled to the very country this video is about. Quite surprised that they eventually were extradited back, considering how "special" they were. Unbeknownst to them, they pissed off other, higher-status "special" people! These results are exactly what I'd expected from a repulsively Fascist and Apartheid fake "State" courtesy of the Balfour Declaration of Hate and Population Replacement. 🙄

  3. Once omicron arrived the only use for the jabs for under 60s was they could go abroad on holiday. Hardly a proper reason for a medical procedure. All those teenagers jabbed .Did the benefits really outweigh the risks? Crazy times.

  4. Testing the booster is meaningful when there is someone to be convinced of its efficacy. Right now, those who will take it have already taken it and demand absolutely no evidence of anything. On the other hand, those who will not take it cannot be convinced to go near it. So just let the 9th and 10th mice go, there is no need to sacrifice them.

  5. Panic in the air, see the headless chickens runnin'

    Golf carts head-on crashin', crackin' heads wide open

    Scratch the grass and mister, you can't breathe

    And roll and writhe in a sand trap, starting to heave

    Claw those clubs, let me see you seethe

    Crazy

    Crazy, crazy, crazy, crazy, crazy, crazy, crazy

    Chemical warfare, chemical warfare

    Chemical warfare, warfare, warfare

    Chemical warfare, chemical warfare

    Chemical warfare, warfare, warfare

    — from "Chemical Warfare" by Dead Kennedys (1980)

  6. Bi valent bioweapon Still got the ultra damaging imprinting of the original Wuhan SARS COV-2 Novel Bioweapon mRNA experimental injection bioweapon that enhances virulence and transmissibility and masquerades as a vaccine.

  7. I met a young man today he said I had vaccine for work and just get sick sick all the time, then
    you will meet another stranger he will say heart problems all under 25 . older lady her health is
    destroyed always sick weak . No vaccines for me, I pray for the sick and to wake up vaccine is
    from the devil. Kill destroy steel you life and health so they get more and more wealth with boosters.

  8. I never took the shot but for those who have I think you should get a booster about every 4 or 5 months and perhaps for the rest of your life or until the phase 3 part of the study is over

  9. I wish vaccine studies would be broken down by types of vaccines. I keep hearing about the decreasing benefits, sometimes with only mRNA candidates, yet not of the rest. I had a non-replicating viral vector vaccine for covid one month after J&J release in U.S. and as of 10/2022, my antibodies still are good (>1200) and I’ve never had covid-19. Natural immunity, Inactivated, Live-attenuated and combinations of should be studied.

  10. We humans are the lab rats for mRNA spike-protein injections. It hasn't;t been done before, and it appears that the immunization does not prevent the illness or the spread of the illness. It was barely tested; we were pumped fear about covid, and vaccinations were mandated on this unproven vaccine. Some people refusing to take it wear losing jobs or became social outcasts. I regret that I was forced to take 2 vaccines. I'm more afraid of what the weird vaccine will do in the long run rather than covid. I could likely fight off covid on my own. Who knows what the vaccine will do? I am "at risk" because older people who have had heart disease are considered high risk. I had myocarditis in my early 20s, and I was fortunate enough to get rid of it with minor heart muscle scarring. Now people getting the vaccine are getting myocarditis or endocarditis. It appears to be a total scam. I'm in my mid 60s, but healthy and strong. I have no clue what the mRNA will do to me. The repeated updates seem like a subscription. Remember thalidomide.

  11. when ASKING GUARDS OF DEATH CAMPS IF ANY DEATHS IN CAMPS FROM BEING IN CAMPS … THE REPLY IS NOT … …. WHEN ASKING INTERNATIONALE ENTERPRISES WHICH MAKE TOXICS IF THEY DAMAGE OR KILL YOU THE REPLY IS NO … PLUS WHAT WE SELL IS ORDERED BY ALLL GOOD WORLD GOVERNMENTS WHO WANT TO CULL THE HERDS BACK ……….totalitarismo governments ARE GOOD FOR SAVING AND DYING WORLD … THIER AGENDAS ARE GREAT FOR EUGENICS AND ELITISTS

  12. There are still some so ingrained with fear that they go like lambs to the slaughter for their boosters. They don't need campaigns – they will make enough money from those who foolishly trust their doctors and the drug companies. People need to remember that you see your doctor for advice and you need to use your own understanding of your body, and research to make your own informed decision – of course this will get harder as WHO try to control social media sites.

  13. There are plenty people out there that actually want to be an experiment and keep on up taking the mRNA like its crack ,if they want to continue being an experiment and take on the risk start paying them..!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0