in

John gets ‘fact checked’

Fact checked video by FB, A video about my video about this research paper
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw08zWJQ2m8&t=90s

Intravenous Injection of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA Vaccine Can Induce Acute Myopericarditis in Mouse Model

https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab707/6353927

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/incorrect-vaccine-administration-is-a-potential-cause-of-post-vaccine-adverse-effects-but-more-research-is-still-needed-to-confirm-or-reject-this-hypothesis/?fbclid=IwAR0nBbM6v0V2WPFn4LxIdfR4FNAvIzLGKhzFPdQPG8mu_FR1InB8OzYQgMc

Leo Nicolai, Cardiology Fellow, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich:

German Centre for Cardiovascular Research

Indeed, there is peer-reviewed work showing in mice that possibly intravenous injection of mRNA vaccine leads to myocardial inflammation.

that intravenous injection of adenoviral vector based vaccine (AZ1222, ChAdOx1) leads to thrombocytopenia and platelet-directed immune responses,

offering a possible explanation for vaccine-induced thrombosis/thrombocytopenia

these data might indicate a simple measure to lower the incidence of vaccine-induced side effects,

There is a lack of data on frequency and effects of IV injection in humans.

Most likely, two approaches are needed to further validate the data:

Large animal studies

Studies comparing incidence of vaccine-associated thrombosis/thrombocytopenia/ myocarditis in countries with mandated syringe aspiration to countries that don’t mandate this practice.

Thrombocytopenia and splenic platelet directed immune responses after intravenous ChAdOx1 nCov-19 administration (29th June 2021)

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.29.450356v1

Recently a rare and novel complication of SARS-CoV-2 targeted adenovirus vaccines has emerged: thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS).

we employ in vitro and in vivo models

to characterize the possible mechanisms of this platelet-targeted autoimmunity.

We show that intravenous but not intramuscular injection of ChAdOx1 triggers platelet-adenovirus aggregate formation and platelet activation.

After intravenous injection, these aggregates are phagocytosed by macrophages in the spleen and platelet remnants are found in the spleen.

This is followed by a pronounced B-cell response with the emergence of circulating antibodies binding to platelets.

Our work contributes to the understanding of TTS and highlights accidental intravenous injection as potential mechanism for post-vaccination TTS.

Hence, safe intramuscular injection, with aspiration prior to injection,

could be a potential preventive measure when administering adenovirus-based vaccines.

Helen Petousis-Harris, Associate Professor, University of Auckland:

Vaccinologist and associate professor at the University of Auckland

There are a range of injection techniques for administering vaccines,

Injecting fast and withdrawing the needle

Injecting slowly before withdrawing

Pulling back on the plunger, seeing there is no blood, then injecting. This is called aspiration.

Rationale for aspirating

vaccine could be inadvertently delivered into the blood rather than the muscle tissue.

But as the flashback of blood hardly ever happens, the practice was abandoned by many practitioners.

I have not seen any evidence to support the rejection of this hypothesis at this stage.

The animal model study supports the possibility that inadvertent injection into a blood vessel could result in undesirable reactions.

However, the majority of myocarditis cases are occurring in young males after the second dose, something that this hypothesis does not explain.

My conclusion is that this requires more research and observing the patterns of post-vaccine myocarditis among populations where aspiration is practiced could be helpful.

Common sense in Denmark

https://en.ssi.dk/news/epi-news/2021/no-19-21—2021

COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen

A single 0.5 mL dose of undiluted vaccine is given.

Based on a precautionary principle, we recommend aspiration before injection.

Download John’s two comprehensive but free educational text books or make a donation to the campbellteaching project using this link: http://159.69.48.3

Written by Dr. John Campbell

Hello Everyone,My name is John Campbell and I am a retired Nurse Teacher and A and E nurse based in England. I also do some teaching in Asia and Africa when time permits. These videos are to help students to learn the background to all forms of health care. My PhD focused on the development of open learning resources for nurses nationally and internationally.

Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. My question is: when one gets a respirstory virus, almost always it is through the mucous membranes nose, mouth etc. We never get a respiratory virus injected into the deltoid muscle. I.e., we dont wear condoms on our little toes. Right? So, then why isnt there a vaccine that mimics the exact process of how we naturally come into contact with a viral pathogen? I.e., through aerosol droplets? I believe it is this natural process of how our bodies recognize a pathogen that the immune system has adapted to over the millenia and is crucial for the immune response to recognize the pathogen in its set stages which gives one the robust natural immunity. After all, so-called "chicken pox parties" for the highly infectious chicken pox virus was just that…kids playing together sharing space and respiration to "innoculate each other natually." So, why can't an aerosol vaccine delivery system be developed? Minus any suspect or controversial adjutants? As it appears that the injection process itself, the kinetics so to speak, is the issue when it comes to folks not accepting them? And that the unatural way if injection may not only potentially causes harm if not done properly but the natural innate immune response is also potentially harmed by not being given the proper "meta instructions" or "evolutuonary narrative," that it reads and understands, that is, the specific step by step activations of antibody creation from the point
    of being alerted at the first contact with the mucuous menbrane to working its way through the body;, and thus not damage potentially long tern innate and adaptive immunity capabilities by "confusing or shackling the innate immunity" natural response to an outside intervention.

  2. My other question: IMMUNO SENESCENCE- as I understand it looking at the data on fatalities to covid pre lockdowns, we had virtually zero fatalities in the 30 years of age and younger cohorts. And those few fatalities were always persons with one or more serious prior existing health conditions. Additionally, almost all the over 65 and especially the over 80 fatalities, most were in senior care facilities and also had one or more serious comorbidity like CVD and CPOD. Why hasnt anyone IN tje MSM ever seemed to explain this immunosenescence process in aging and the natural waning of ones natural ability to fight pathogens?. Re the large number of elderly who prior to 2019 were fatalities to the common flu? And related to this question: it is true that for the last 20 to 30 years the push for a yearly flu shot for elderly and even 55 plus was very prevalent in health care in the West. (I personally know of many in that 55 plus range who insisted every year on getting a flu vaccine- I personally, do not believe in annual flu vaccines.) My question is, those who are now 75 and 85 plus, who got those yearly flu shots starting at 50 and 55, is there any evidence that those continual outside interverventions re vaccine doses, somehow danaged their natural innate and adaptive immune response? Re: it is known that many senior citizens in the plus 70 age group who were healthy and very mobile and active were reported that they got covid infections and fully recovered with no issue. Did those elderly who easily recovered from covid also take yearly flu shots for 20 to 25 years? I also know some folks in thst age range who refused them i.e. also didnt 'believe in it.' I think its important to see that 'yearly flu vaccine' data compared to those known to have seccumbed to covid who were in the 70 ton80 plus age range tonsee if a causal connection exists between getting those yearly flu vaccines and succeptibility to covid fatality.

  3. I am not buying this. I am not saying aspirating is important but I am sure there are other side effects if done properly. It seems like another way of passing the buck to the people who are giving the jab rather than government or pharma. Which then leads me to believe that this channel is controlled opposition.

  4. The chances of hitting a blood vessel may be minimal, but so is winning a million quid on The Premium Bonds but every month two lucky individuals do indeed win a million quid on The Premium Bonds.

  5. Actually , there is some research (survey) on how often they accidentaly hit a bloodvessel, but just in general, see DOI: 10.1177/1054773815575074 .
    " Of the participants who continue to aspirate, only 3% aspirate for the recommended 5 to 10 s. Forty percent reported having aspirated blood at least once, whereas 6 RNs (4%) noted blood aspiration ≥13 times. Blood aspiration occurred most frequently in the dorsal gluteal (15%) and deltoid (12%)"

  6. In Russia, the aspiration probe is sometimes done, but often neglected. My grandma, who's a doctor, before she was given the vaccine had to specifically ask the nurse to aspirate. But it wasn't something the nurse would do by default.

  7. I don't know anything much about medicine, but I know Facebook. Facebook do NOT do "fact checking", especially not in regards to coronavirus; they only "fact check" against one side of the aisle. If they are fact checking Dr Campbell, he'd better watch out, it means they are looking for an excuse to suspend his account.

  8. It's clearly Youtube doing a guilt by association.

    But you don't want to be associated with Dimmy Jores.. He's an anti-vaxxer.. Which is why I think Youtube got the wrong end of the stick here.

    Stick with the science, nothing can be learned from this crank, he's using your viable critique as a means to get a false endorsement from you; misrepresenting what you're saying in order to promote not getting the vaccine is probably what got you dragged in by these dishonest Actors, John.
    Shaun's Channel did a great in-depth analysis of Dimmy Jore's bullshit on his anti-vax rhetoric.

  9. Would anyone know of a good way to find a place that aspirates? I have called several pharmacies and went to a local vaccination center and they have all either said that they weren't willing to aspirate or didn't know what I was talking about.

  10. Thanks so much John for your channel and your efforts to promote the truth and educate people around the importance of aspiration when administering the vaccine.
    I went to receive my first dose of moderna a couple of days ago at a local chemist.
    My polite request for aspiration was met with refusal so I walked out and went to our city's large vaccination center.
    I asked to speak with a senior nurse, explained my concerns and she was quite accommodating, although her role was to coordinate the other nurses there she was happy to administer my shot herself – correctly (you would've been proud of her)
    The following day took my 17yo son there, upon his registration at the center I asked to speak with the same nurse, she asked around and found another experience senior nurse who would comply and directed us to wait outside her booth with instructions to ignore all other staff members (all amid some very disapproving stares from them – I suppose we weren't behaving like the compliant sheep as expected)

    It all went smoothly and I watched as she correctly and skillfully administered the vaccine.
    Thanks again John, you're doing a great job.

  11. This is on a slightly different problem which I expect will help to explain why the majority of vaccine administrators won't change their technique, they would need retraining. On a recent trip to the hospital for an mri I was amazed when the chap came to fit me with a canular. I advised him that he wouldn't be able to get a vein on my arm because I was a drug addiction for over 30 years, and when he asked where do they normally get me in replied there's a couple of good ones on my lower leg. He said he would have to find a doctor because " I'm only trained to do it on your arm." When I offered to do it for him, which I have done several times before the NHS was sold to America, he said oh no I'll have to go find a dr. I had to wait a further 40 mins and the dr that came insisted on getting one in the back of my hand, in a vein so fragile….sorry I'm going off on a rant. Point was they don't half need some retraining away from this new culture of its not my job or I'm not qualified…nvq…not very qualified. ..asperate befofe any injection. You certainly don't want one of these clowns hitting an artery, even in a capillary it really hurts 😥

  12. This nurse John Campbell, who is not a bloody physician, sure has caused a lot of upset and antagonism in here with his dumb ox "message" of telling people to make sure the Covid needle is aspirated.
    That's a lot of bologna ! 21st century needles don't need to be aspirated. Plus the Covid needle is short and small. No chance it's going to hit a vein by going into an arm muscle. Aspirated needles HURT ! The frontline workers giving the injections 7.66 BILLION TIMES THUS FAR, KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING.
    Just like the Kitchen Nightmares Chef that will never admit to Ramsay their cooking sucks or change their tune, Campbell here will probably never own up to being wrong and causing massive chaos against the vaccine. Time for you all to unsubscribe and stop feeding this nurse's 6 digit income.

  13. Yeah right. 7.66 BILLION DOSES OF VACCINE have been incorrectly given because this nurse Johnson says different.
    Who's right? All the physicians, other nurses, scientists and health care workers in the world 🌎 OR this dude – who's a freaking nurse! #$@+$$^=+ AND HE'S WRONG!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0