The Hill
Journalist, Matt Taibbi, details his reporting on the controversy surrounding the Covid-19 treatment Ivermectin.
About Rising:
Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day’s political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day’s political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country’s most important political newsmakers.
Follow Rising on social media:
Website: Hill.TV
Facebook: facebook.com/HillTVLive/
Instagram: @HillTVLive
Twitter: @HillTVLive
The hill swamp media
If Ivermectin is a viable treatment to COVID19 would vaccine makers loose EUA?
BIG PHARMA would be even more “Upset” if folks found out how new studies show IVERMECTIN is a CANCER KILLER and it could potentially CHANGE THE GAME in treating a WIDE VERITY OF CANCERS!!! NOPE THEY WOULDN’T LIKE THAT ONE BIT…
Genuine censorship. Silicon Valley is headed for a train wreck.
The level of press censorship in the U.S. is now on a par with that in a communist dictatorship (or any other suppressive dictatorship). We no longer have a free press. The fact is that information now goes through the internet, and the internet giants censor stories in the most blatant way.
Remember when all the democrats didn't trust the vaccine when Trump said it could be ready by end of 2020?
This is the way! Thank you for talking about this. Bret Weinstien's channel should not be censored.
awesome interview. legacy media has no pride in their craft….no journalism, just issue advocacy
Politicians started snubbing the science of ivermectin back in 2020, before big tech. It's almost like they work together…
The regular media establishment is broken and can not be fixed. It is corrupt to the core more of a Russian trust situation for the talented and Pravda for the rest.
Matt Taibbi; "…People are self-medicating with this drug all over the world now, is that a good idea that's a different question entirely…" Matt's framing leaves the concept of self-medication entirely up in the air, and I'm sure he knows the medical community does not recommend self-medicating. As a responsible reporter, he should've stated so, but that would not fit the narrative to sell the story.
Climate change… Building collapse ??????????????????????????
this ranks as the best clip today on the whole of YT, right behind is the stacking of olit 7 in boca chica
Why is Matt in favor of Bret Weinstein being demonetized?
It’s used in Venezuela as a treatment for COVID
So I guess this video won’t be monetized. Let us know if YouTube messes with you.
Mat's segment on the danger of Big Tech and Legacy Media banning suppositions is eerily close the the "Wrongthink" concept from Orwell's 1984…
Read Adolph Huxley's "Brave New World," and you'll see how similar it is to what is going on now.
Youtube demonetized weinstein? That’s great.
solution is enforce free speech
Get Dr Pierre Kory on! Ivermectin works …. which is why it's being suppressed. Because emergency authorizations of the jabs couldn't have gone ahead if there was a viable/safe treatment available.
??♂️Matt. THANK YOU mate. I've been bleating about IVERMECTIN being awesome since last Aug/Sept 2020. Disgusted that Susan Wojcicki's YouTube removed Pierre Kory's own Senate statement. I'm a kidney transplant recipient, spine cancer survivor & have HLA antibodies – I have to avoid the novel new covid vaccine. I'm 49 & Ivermectin's been around since I was 5. I'd rather have a decades old PROVEN prophylactic like IVERMECTIN.
Hey, at least the Flu was removed from society. Or the PCR tests were picking up any type of inflammation or flu, instead of COVID. Which do you think is more likely?
Very well put Mr David Blackman …please keep commenting
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ is the problem
Yes Mr S UDE
It’s simple the powers that be don’t want people to be healthy. There is no money to be made with healthy people
google Mexico City+ covid+ ivermectin. Even msm cannot hide the results which is more "real" than any medical study.
Matt is either being careful or just minimizing. As of February of this year, at least 50 studies had been done on Ivermectin, dozens of them peer reviewed; nearly all showing effectiveness against Covid. Food for thought: if there had early on been a drug that was found to be effective against Covid across the board, then vaccines would not have been given emergency use authorization. Bad for Pfizer et all.
"reportedly created some controversy." -word salad telling you it's bad.
Thank you for talking about it. Surreal that the press isn't covering the science.
you guys are getting better ??
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So enraged,this cause so much hurt in Latinoamerica, the original paper about the treatment in vitro was retracted, cause it couldnt be replicated. There were NO positive results, in any cientific study, IN ANY AT ALL No medical journal, or a research had came out with enough evidence it works in the slightly!
The lowest of the lows the rich who own these social media companies are in bed with big pharma that doesn't want any competition to their vaccines. The filthy dirty rich belong in jail.
I am pretty sure my rabbit got Ivermectin against ear mites. I am so confused to hear this name in the context of Covid-19.
It's only controversial because big pharma can't make money off itm that's the only reason they are censoring discussion of it
It's not about politics, that's just what they want people to think. In reality it's about the money
annoying that there focus is about how it affects there reporting, not so much about individuals being censored
Prophylactic, prophylactic, prophylactic…not treatment. Its works for treatment, but less so. But prophylactic as a direct vaccine alternative is the most effective use.
Also the best evidence is seen by the use on mass scale. It crushed Covid in Peru from May 2020 until November when a regime change brought in a new President that banned it outside of prescription. Also in Mexico where it was mass distributed, it halted Covid completely. Same for Delhi and other provinces in India. Within two weeks of it being readily used, Covid has been crushed every time. BUT you have to keep taking it every so often so once its out of your system and your Doctors will be fired if they prescribe it, Covid comes storming back in. Just like Peru.
It doesn't matter if a cat is black or white, so long as it catches mice. – Deng Xiaoping
Censorship has killed hundreds of thousands and those people should be held responsible.
Yes, they should be put on trial and jailed for suppression of a cure and suppression of speech!!
I live in Germany, when googling "Ivermectin" first results are all like "Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent Covid19…" and even a google warning…
Thank you for this story.
Some yahoos lynched German butchers back in 1917. Therefore nobody should have reported on WWI?
If we have a nuremburg trial in the future, we could get at the puppet masters who pulled the strings on YouTube and other media (particularly corporate media) and gave the orders to the WHO, CDC, FDA, NIH, EMU. If we could get those puppet masters in jail the world would be much better.
Oh so if you take ivermectin means you are a right winger? Logic??????????
I have used this drug to worm my dog. It's a wormer.
What might be of interest is that the Indian government authorities removed the drug from the approved drug list for covid treatment sometime in May stating that there is no correlation between the drug use and treatment of the disease.
However, in the United States things are going crazy. As people are being prevented from speaking about the drug itself.
The CDC / FDA in case of US and national authorities in case of other nations should be the only ones who should say yes or no to a drug on the basis of clinical studies. Not some internet company.