in

Mexico and India data on IM (Pierre Kory & Bret Weinstein)

Mexico and India using novel COVID treatment
Clip from Bret Weinstein and Pierre Kory on DarkHorse – CENSORED on YouTube – available on Spotify or here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/qHjNQIynVb5O/

00:00 Disclaimer
01:33 Clip starts

On this very special live broadcast of the DarkHorse podcast, Dr. Bret Weinstein (Ph.D) and Dr. Pierre Kory (M.D.) will discuss the ongoing pandemic, the care of COVID-19 patients, and the incredible story of Ivermectin.

Mentioned in the full episode:

British Ivermectin Recommendation Development group: https://bird-group.org

The BIRD Recommendation on the Use of Ivermectin for Covid-19:
Executive Summary: https://bird-group.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/bird-executive-summary-1.pdf

Carvallo et al 2020. Study of the efficacy and safety of topical ivermectin+ iota-carrageenan in the prophylaxis against COVID-19 in health personnel. J. Biomed. Res. Clin. Investig., 2. https://medicalpressopenaccess.com/upload/1605709669_1007.pdf

Cobos-Campos et al 2021.Potential use of ivermectin for the treatment and prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Efficacy of ivermectin for SARS-CoV-2. Clin Res Trials, 7: 1-5. https://www.readkong.com/page/potential-use-of-ivermectin-for-the-treatment-and-2189857

Database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 93 studies, 55 peer reviewed, 56 with results comparing treatment and control groups: https://c19ivermectin.com

Karale et al 2021. A Meta-analysis of Mortality, Need for ICU admission, Use of Mechanical Ventilation and Adverse Effects with Ivermectin Use in COVID-19 Patients. medRxiv. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/05/04/2021.04.30.21256415.full.pdf

Kory et al 2021. Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19. American Journal of Therapeutics, 28(3): e299: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/

Nardelli et al 2021. Crying wolf in time of Corona: the strange case of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Is the fear of failure withholding potential life-saving treatment from clinical use?. Signa Vitae, 1: 2. https://oss.signavitae.com/mre-signavitae/article/20210508-344/pdf/3-4%20SV2021022602.pdf

Yagisawa et al 2021. Global trends in clinical studies of ivermectin in COVID-19. The Japanese Journal of Antibiotics, 74: 1. https://www.psychoactif.org/forum/uploads/documents/161/74-1_44-95.pdf


The FLCCC:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/

Dr. Kory on Twitter:
@PierreKory

Find Bret Weinstein on Twitter: @BretWeinstein, and on Patreon.

Please subscribe to this channel for more long form content like this, and subscribe to the clips channel @DarkHorse Podcast Clips for short clips of all our podcasts.

DarkHorse merchandise now available at: store.darkhorsepodcast.org

Theme Music: Thank you to Martin Molin of Wintergatan for providing us the rights to use their excellent music.

Comments

  1. Stereotypical facile thinking coupled with internet clickbait format……………..which proves that "pseudoscience" and conspiracy theory propagation today is in fact = an online business.

    Moral of the story: vaccines work via eliciting the immune system to generate its own immunity via the creation of IgG specific antibodies. Meanwhile therapeutics such as Ivermectin like all pharmacological agents gives rise to = "resistance" with overuse. So it is not rocket science – but it is science……as well as commonsense.

    Vaccines do not inherently promote resistance via their use as they do not directly impact the organism as say an antibiotic does via attacking its structure. They rather generate antibody creation and those antibodies in turn "inactivate" the pathogen via blocking its binding receptors to allow macrophages to envelop and destroy it.

    Accordingly as opposed to a pharmacological agent which directly attacks the organism via cellular destruction or replicative interference = vaccines via widescale use do not lend to mutative adaptation of the organism………which is what could occur with use of Ivermectin. Giving it to millions let alone more people would invariably generate resistive adaptation which would complicate long-term effectiveness of it the same as with overuse of penicillin or whatever. "Think harder" folks. lol!

  2. If it wasn’t so serious it would be funny how our healthcare officials have put millions of lives in danger by downplaying these drugs that have been proven to help people with Covid and the Democrats going along with it just to hurt Trump

  3. The footballer CRISTIAN ERICKSON had the Pfizer ?on the 31st may, one scientist as been saying for months that it is causing heart inflammation in some young men ????

  4. The truth finds a way. Many very brave Doc's, R.N.'s, researchers and scientists are speaking out at the risk of their career and lives….Millions could have been saved with early Ivermectin, H.Q., zinc, Vitamin C, wormwood, L-Lysine et al….but that would have made the death count from Covid 1984 too low to justify a lockdown.

  5. Bret can't go at this alone. He needs to get out and do some other podcasts/shows. He needs others to get this message out. Why isn't he? It's so easy to go on somebody's podcast via Zoom.
    There must be others willing to talk about it? Perhaps if you get 10 different doctors to join the discussion? Dr. Cory said his organisation has 6 offices around the world. Or even better, what about a debate with doctors who argue against it? That would be awesome to see!

  6. i wonder why population number havent decreased much considering we just endured a pandemic. if you look at the big picture things really dont look that bad. everyday since the pandemic start there has always been more births then deaths per day. yet the news says otherwise. the amount of births perday on average is double the amount of deaths we have per day on average. today 3 times more babies were born then there were deaths. in the past year there was 3 times more births then deaths through out this whole year… im not an antimasker. gunna wear those till the day i die. but god damn the number and stats really dont show much of a dent in deaths since before the pandemic even started. so now im confused af.

  7. Prevention is the end goal (aka the positive outcome) of profilaxis. Pro=Prior & Filaxis=Protection.

    Non important but I wanted to mention that…

  8. In 2005, H1N1 Pandemic (Spanish Flu) was reconstructed in a CDC Lab, funded and promoted by Anthony Fauci. Following that, was years of gain of function research, that included the addition of a spike protein. This is all well documented. In addition, after the complete genome sequence was assembled, it was published in the gene bank. Why the hell would you publish the genome sequence for the most deadly pandemic known to man? I have my theories. Someone please test for this because if you do, you will find that it is circulating. I’m very sure.

  9. President Trump may not have been your choice for President but he was not sinister like the Democratic party has become. Come on over the water is fine. Come over to freedom, American freedom.

  10. So ,according to Fauci's emails the us paid a Chinese lab to weaponise a virus and then it escaped.
    We know the result.
    Can the world get compensation from the US?
    Why not?

Loading…

0