Dr. John Campbell
58% of covid US deaths now in the vaccinated
Kaiser Family Foundation vice president Cynthia Cox
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/effectiveness-research/protocols.html
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/effectiveness/monitoring.html
58% of coronavirus deaths in August were people who were vaccinated or boosted
(people who had completed at least their primary series of vaccines)
Therefore 42% coronavirus deaths in August were people who were unvaccinated
First time there were more deaths covid deaths in the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-people-booster-percent-pop5
In September 2021
Vaccinated people, 23% of coronavirus fatalities
In January and February 2022
Vaccinated people, 42% of coronavirus fatalities
We can no longer say this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated
(who conducted the analysis on behalf of the Post)
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7144a3.htm?s_cid=mm7144a3_w
Safety Monitoring of Bivalent COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Booster Doses Among Persons Aged ≥12 Years — United States, August 31–October 23, 2022
On August 31, 2022
FDA authorized bivalent, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna
mRNA encoding the spike protein from original strain of SARS-CoV-2,
and from Omicron BA.4 and BA.5
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended,
all persons ≥12 years receive an age-appropriate bivalent mRNA booster dose
v-safe
a voluntary smartphone-based U.S. safety surveillance system,
established by CDC to monitor adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination
As of 3rd October, 10 million users
https://icandecide.org/press-release/breaking-news-ican-obtains-cdc-v-safe-data/
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
Total data, August 31–October 23, 2022
14.4 million received a bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech
8.2 million adults (≥18 years) a bivalent Moderna booster dose
v-safe, among the 211,959 registrants (aged ≥12 years)
August 31–October 23, 2022
Reported in the week after vaccination
Injection site reactions, 60.8%
Systemic reactions, 54.8%
Fewer than 1% of v-safe registrants reported receiving medical care
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
5,542 reports of adverse events after bivalent booster vaccination (≥12 years)
95.5% of reports were nonserious
4.5% were serious events
Health care providers and patients can be reassured that adverse events reported after a bivalent booster dose are consistent with those reported after monovalent doses.
Relative risk
Absolute risk not given
Health impacts after COVID-19 vaccination are less frequent and less severe than those associated with COVID-19 illness (2).
Relative risk
Absolute risk not given
This is their Reference 2
Block JP, Boehmer TK, Forrest CB, et al. Cardiac complications after SARS-CoV-2 infection and mRNA COVID-19 vaccination—PCORnet, United States, January 2021–January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:517–23. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7114e1 PMID:35389977
myocarditis; myocarditis or pericarditis; and myocarditis, pericarditis, or MIS,
within 7-day or 21-day risk windows after the index date
Comparisons between after vaccine and after infection
Relative risk
Absolute risk not given
Review of v-safe Data
During August 31–October 23, 2022
211,959 v-safe registrants had a bivalent booster
1,464 (0.7%) were aged 12–17 years
68,592 (32.4%) were aged 18–49 years
59,209 (27.9%) were aged 50–64 years
82.694 (39.0%) were aged ≥65 years
Fourth dose
96,241; 45.4%
Fifth dose
106,423; 50.2%
In the week after receipt of the bivalent booster dose
Local injection site reactions
49.7% among aged ≥65
72.9% among aged 18–49
Systemic reactions
43.5% among aged ≥65
67.9% among aged 18–49
Systemic symptoms
Fatigue (30.0%–53.1%)
Headache (19.7%–42.8%)
Myalgia (20.3%–41.3%)
Fever (10.2%–26.3%)
Reported inability to complete normal daily activities
10.6% among aged ≥65 years
19.8% among aged 18–49 years
Receipt of medical care
Reported by 0.8% of registrants
With covid even the very elite were deceived
I'm not saying it wasn't tested, but maybe it should have been tested more
unfortunately in the U.S., most of us realize the FDA and CDC are in the hands of big pharma. this whole rotten system is corrupt and needs remedied.
This breaks my vaccinated heart.
Didn't want it. Had to get it.
May any and all of the people who knew they were providing an unsafe vaccines for monetary benefit suffer appropriately.
John- I'm a PhD holding quantitative scientist. I am concerned you are not. Your presentation is misleading because you do not understand rudimentary biostatistical analysis. What do I mean? As you started the presentation, you mention how percentages of deaths increase with time for the vaccinated population, and decrease for the unvaccinated. Until you divide each group's death percentage by its vaccinated percentage, you will be making comparisons of apples with oranges. Example: Unvaccinated: if 42% of deaths occur in 20% of the population (this simultaneously means 58% of deaths occur in 80% of the population among vaccinated). You MUST divide 42%/20% = 2.1 and 58%/80% = 0.7 to arrive at the relative risk for the two groups. In this example, the relative risk of death is 3x higher among unvaccinated versus vaccinated. Until you do the math correctly, your presentations will be misleading and biased by your incomplete knowledge about statistics. You may get lots of subscribers who fall for conspiracy theories, but that's blood money on your conscience.
Blaming health agencies because of your incomplete understanding of statistics is unbecoming of you, and shows poorly on the educational institution where you received you doctorate (if you have one). Please do better, or don't post on YouTube.
Daniel Karner, PhD
University of California, Berkeley
So since the ratio is 4:1 of vaccinated to unvaccinated people in country; if it’s 56% deaths from vaccinated then wouldn’t that mean there were actually very few from the unvaccinated?
Happy to be part of the control group😁 you should do a video on how "helpful" the "standard treatment" (remdesivir) is vs control group🤦♂️
Isnt this what you would expect? If 100% of the population was vaccinated then 100% of those who die would be vaccinated.
I'm a 77 year old man who has gotten 2 Moderna jabs and 1 booster with no side affects. Have never tested positive for Covid. I have no personal friends that had any severe side affects from the vacinations. I don't plan on getting any further jabs. Would rather trust natural immunity.
The data is flawed right from the start. The term "Covid Death" is not defined. How many people, generally healthy, contracted Covid and it killed them? How many generally healthy people were killed by Covid, and Covid alone? Good luck finding that data. It is simply not available.
Bullshit..😠😠
Too many in America have not gotten the booster..VAERS is unregulated…not verified…meaning anyone can report any effects without proof it were a side effect of vaccination. I had the bivalent booster..no issues. Nothing unusual here.
Trump is right
Did they test the va$&$$ with LAL
Biden’s comment…”it’s a pandemic of the unvaccinated” back when he said it, was never a valid statement backed up by any actual facts. It should have been called out as such!!
Having designed natl. healthcare systems my hat's off for anyone relying on poorly tested drugs to stay alive.
I always remove my hat for funerals.
The vaccine worked well but it’s wearing off also I saw a unicorn but u can’t see it anymore because it left
And that's because all the information isn't available. Your information is always against the real truth. You twist the facts. You were against vaccinations from the start. So it's easy for you to find unintelligent people on YouTube that you can confuse with your bullshit.
I have noticed those up to date with jabs are a lot sicker when in contact with even the mildest of viruses. Others have had covid two or three times already this year and are really poorly with it and missing days/weeks form work.Meanwhile the unjabbed or those who only had one or two doses are at work. I can see with my own eyes the effects of jabs on people.The booster programme and flu jabs have played havoc. I do think it is ridiculous to be jabbed and still be off work due to respiratory flu. It completely undermines the point of them in young to middle age adults.
They are some data he is presenting. It looks as if other health professionals are proved correct the more jabs the worse the prognosis. The negative effect of regular doses does look to be cumulative.
Headline is a bit misleading
Disclaimer; These media including videos, book, e book, articles, podcasts are not peer-reviewed. They should never replace individual clinical judgement from your own health care provider. No media-based material on this channel is suitable for using as professional medical advice. All comments are also for educational purposed only and must never replace advice from your own health care provider.
Where’s the evidence that ‘protective effects’ are waning? Wouldn’t it be appropriate to look at evidence that ADE may be happening?
My Mother was offered thalidomide for morning sickness when she was carrying me. Mercifully she said no.
Dear Dr Campbell,
A respectful note on absolute risk: absolute risk is likely not given due to different prevalence when studies are done. It’s not a useful piece of data when prevalence changes. Relative risk is more accurate for comparisons in cases of infectious diseases where prevalence changes wildly. Both absolute risk reduction (and so number needed to treat) are not good estimates of much when prevalence changes. There’s actually an EXCELLENT review by medcram that illustrates relative risk reduction vs absolute risk reduction. Dr S says it better than I just did. Thanks for your work. Much appreciated
I got booted off Facebook for posting information directly from the VARES reporting system and that's a Government entity
This is so True..
And now they are not going to jab men under 35. Well isnt that swell. AND……at the same time they will allow jabs on 6 months old babies…
I have lost healthy friends due to the shots, and lot of friends suffer from diabetes, cancer, heart problem,depression etc etc.
And I have a friend who is a nurse and she has a machine to check If you have spike proteines .
i wouldn't trust this guy to treat a hangnail
Enjoying the way you are now "walking that fine line", Dr. Campbell…….great vids coming out. lights are 'on', appreciate the view.
Dear Dr Campbell, its a sad state of affairs when you have to dance around the Statistics like the Argentine Tango!! The old saying of; Lies Dammed Lies and Statistics comes to mind. At least we can read between the lines.
I’ve a family member, 70+ years old, never had Covid . Had the original first 2 vaccines and days after the 2nd vaccine, started having chest pain, arrhythmia, sent to a cardiologist, had heart cath which showed clots and a 75% blockage in a cardiac vessel. Had stint placed and has to take 5 new medications for rest of life.
There never was a risk benefit analysis.
The vvu status is not statistically useful as the u control group is too small. This is the entire reason for the total vaccination move.
The way he talks is somewhere between the original Batman and Captain Kirk…but with Ringo Starr thrown in.
I remember when 1 injection was not considered vaccinated, and 2 injections not considered vaccinated until two weeks after. And after 2,3 or 6 months, depending on jurisdiction, after an injection you were back to being not vaccinated again. Makes it easy to fudge the figures on 'unvaccinated' deaths.
Thank you, while cases of COVID-19 do occur after vaccination, an excess of breakthrough infections could suggest a lack of vaccine effectiveness, consistent with the FDA definition of an adverse event as including “failure to produce the expected pharmacologic action”. For COVID, these concerns may be exacerbated by the emergence of viral mutations conferring possible vaccine escape, including some known variants of concern, making prompt detection of lack of effectiveness a public health imperative.
While some serious safety concerns remain for COVID-19 vaccines, eg, anaphylaxis and Guillain-Barre Syndrome, lack of vaccine effectiveness is of particular importance given the potential risk of severe COVID-19 disease and mortality. Such information may also be useful for addressing the hesitancy occasioned by the accelerated development of these vaccine. While there are some reports quantifying the extent of breakthrough infections and severity of any associated symptoms based on surveillance or electronic medical record data, person-generated data, sometimes called patient-reported health data or patient reported outcomes provide additional insights, especially for symptoms that may not occasion medical care.
*https://www.dovepress.com/covid-19-vaccination-breakthrough-infections-in-a-real-world-setting-u-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IDR.
*https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/8/1/e002187.
*https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jmv.27985.
This man really spouts a load of drivel.