NEW Docs Provide Damning Evidence Dr. Fauci, NIH FUNDED Wuhan Covid Research With TAXPAYER Dollars

Ryan Grim, Kim Iversen, and Robby Soave react to newly revealed documents that show the NIH funded risky bat coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology from 2015 to 2019.

About Rising:
Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day’s political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day’s political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country’s most important political newsmakers.

Follow Rising on social media:

Website: Hill.TV


Instagram: @HillTVLive

Twitter: @HillTVLive

Written by The Hill

The Hill is the premier source for policy and political news. Follow for tweets on what's happening in Washington, breaking news and retweets of our reporters.


Leave a Reply
  1. This is old information. The documents have been available online. Studies/Financial docs that show the funding did happen with timelines etc. Available for anyone that does their research!

  2. "Vaccine patches" Yes, it's been here under the radar. mark of beast. turns out, r.f.chip was just their slight of hand. To slip this in. Bio marking dyes in patch. Eventually put in all bandaids. Who hasn't cut their forhead, or hand. And doesn't just slap a bandaid on. They will be tattooing themselves with the mark. In form of brand names and company logos. That smartphones can make visible. Or store monitors at self checkouts.

  3. I know for a fact this was done on purpose because all the evidence points to it. One the Chinese people were standing up for a democracy government and the government wanted to control their people, second it happened on the day of the biggest celebration that people all over the world come to and China would love an opportunity to attack the US and have no blame for it, for us to retaliate. But the investigation was delayed for a very long time, more than enough time to cover up any evidence and the WHO allowed them this time and refused to investigate until China said it was ok to come check!!! Why would they give them ample amount of time to destroy the evidence. It's like telling the drug dealer what time and day they would be coming to do a raid on their home!!!!! What!!!! It was a cover up by the world order.

  4. Where have ya been? What do you think the Congressional Hearings are About?Your Deliberate Ignorance is not an excuse and Shallow attempts to mirror what you think people Are thinking Is Seriously Plastic

  5. America !!!! How ACTIVELY FAST you have been ( centries pass )to condem, victimise other STATES for what USA deems ' Damning opressive ……' . Now you have Fauci ++++ MURDERING millions around Earth and DO NOTHING about their ACTION for * our family*.

  6. Kim was right to say she doesn't know enough about the subject to say if research was inappropriate. The big issue was this funding was covered up. Fuel for the fire of Dem vs Rep. I hate this anger and fear on both sides.

  7. Lawrence Tabak, NIH principal deputy director, said in the Wednesday letter that EcoHealth provided a five-year progress report on bat coronavirus research conducted under an NIH grant, and that “in this limited experiment, laboratory mice infected with the SHC014 WIV1 bat coronavirus became sicker than those infected with the WIV1 bat coronavirus.”

  8. Despite repeated denials by NIAID Director Anthony Fauci that his agency used American taxpayer money to fund Chinese gain of function research on bats infected with coronaviruses, the National Institutes of Health – which oversees NIAID – admitted in a letter to House Oversight Committee ranking member James Comer, R-Ky., that a "limited experiment" was indeed conducted. LIAR!!

  9. That young guy's black polka-dotted or speckled or whatever shirt kind of distracted from what he was saying. Bad fashion choice. In general these people are not very precise in their speech. Which is not to say that what they are saying is invalid. They just don't express it very well

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *