New Study Evaluates High Dose Ivermectin, Fluvoxamine, and Metformin for Outpatient COVID-19

Roger Seheult, MD of MedCram examines a new study comparing high dose Ivermectin, Fluvoxamine, and Metformin for outpatient COVID-19. See all Dr. Seheult’s videos at:
(This video was recorded on August 26, 2022)

Roger Seheult, MD is the co-founder and lead professor at
He is Board Certified in Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Disease, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine and an Associate Professor at the University of California, Riverside School of Medicine.


Randomized Trial of Metformin, Ivermectin, and Fluvoxamine for Covid-19 (NEJM) |

Mission (Parsemus Foundation) |

Prevention Protocol (FLCCC) |

All coronavirus updates are at (including more discussion on delta variant covid, COVID Delta, COVID children, natural immunity COVID 19, and more).

MedCram Update 46:

MedCram Update 47:

MedCram Update 132:

Get notified of new videos by hitting the bell icon


MedCram offers group discounts for students and medical programs, hospitals, and other institutions. Contact us at if you are interested.


Media Contact:
Media contact info:

Video Produced by Kyle Allred



MedCram medical videos are for medical education and exam preparation, and NOT intended to replace recommendations from your doctor.

#COVID19 #Omicron #Coronavirus


Leave a Reply
  1. As a diabetic I take 500mg of Metformin twice a day.
    I wonder what the interaction of someone taking 1000mg of Metformin a day for diabetes along with having both the latest Covid-19 AND the current Flu shot. The problem with Metformin is that a majority of people get the known side-effect of diarrhea and sometimes intestinal gas behind the diarrhea. 1000mg/day does not bother me at all BUT my friend can only tolerate 250mg/day. Both of us are type 2 diabetics.

  2. I'm not clear about how this study proceeded, but if the purpose, as the endpoint sounds, was measuring the effect of these meds on severe disease, then it's an incorrect or inadequate purpose. IVM and Fluvoxamine are both recommended for early treatment, because this is what proofed successful by the doctors that applied it. Why would the designers "expect" the meds to work in the severe stage?
    Another miss in the study is the arbitrary use of zinc. This is recommended as a general inmune system booster. The only specific application is with HDC, which is the finding of, the late, Dr. Zelenko; this isn't in the trial.
    It's curious this was done with overweight patients, as is universally understood that they will fare worse than average with ANY illness. The trial would need a very different design, as obese patients may be affected by a variety of conditions.

    Dr. Seheult, what are you doing? We expect you to know all this? The Together Trial was exposed as failed by design; why even mention it?
    I suppose you have access to any study in the world, and there must be hundreds monthly, maybe thousands, but you pick to review one that was designed very differently from what's recommended for these meds? What about the hundreds of trials/studies in favor of IVM? What about the thousands saved by IVM and HDC?

    I'm sorry, Dr. Seheult, but you seem to be in the pocket of interests which are against the well being of the citizens.
    I hope you understand that, this kind of video, has contributed to the harm and death of millions of humans that followed the wrong "advice".
    You are responsible in this. With all that's known at this point, about the "vaccine" and the meds, you should be ashamed to continue this malicious propapaganda, and you should be accountable.

  3. If decisions were already made on their efficacy, without study, why look now. Would making an informed decision after the fact be the best way to make decisions? I, personally, wold have done an effacacy study before I made a decision of this magnitude.

  4. So happy to see the truth prevails in the end. Lies are half way around the world as truth is still getting out of bed putting on its pants (read that quote somewhere and always liked it).

  5. You are being distracted.. search.. VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System put in place in 1990. Please search. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% (read more about underreporting in VAERS) of vaccine injuries. OpenVAERS is built from the HHS data available for download
    The OpenVAERS Project allows browsing and searching of the reports without the need to compose an advance search

  6. So, why'd they only give it for 3 days instead of 5 days at the same or possibly slightly increased level by 70 micrograms. I mean obviously we're here for mectin data and they're obviously here to obfuscate mectin data, so let's just cut to the chase and to a real study showing actual effectiveness shall we? I think the plan is to wait it out through so many iterations of C that it won't matter because endemicity will be the norm and the drug pushers will still get that sweet old and infirm candy.

  7. Oh look Parsemus Foundations got their start with funding from North Carolina University using money from the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation for male contraception. Isn't it interesting how all of these covid studies just keep on turning up these weird past connections?

  8. I don't understand kilograms as a measurement. Since I live in the USA, I only understand pounds. So I can't figure out the right dosage for me for Ivermectin.
    I weigh 160 pounds. Female
    I have 3 mgs tablets. I've had them for a while because I can't get help with understanding the correct dosage. Any help with this would be very much appreciated.

  9. The key is the zinc with the protocol. These Dr's have expressed the protocol works together. Zinc is said to help get ivermectin to where it needs to go. Without using zinc ivermectin has less value. If you look at other studies using high dose vitamin c there are positive results to the patient.

  10. Keep providing us the emerging info. You have been at the top since the begining.
    Here in the UK, all med care is free=selfcare low priority. Those with overt extreme need, (after the barn door closes) rewarded w their suffering being addressed too late and high cost. Prevention unknown, seen as 'quacks', but emerging. NHS is helpless to figure out how to protect their services. Entire demographic high proportion of elderly pension dependent… determined to be compliant at any cost! Current effort is get the bivalent vax into everyone over 12, flue vax now pushed hard too and shingles offered. Increases trust in the NHS and grows 'the elephant in the room' 'Nanny State' keen to protect the stretched beyond recovery services, line up. The cautious stay silent for risk of discrimination. The delayed cancer therapy, heart operations, issues not diagnosed…..die politely. Mental health issues escalate, home heating cost now rise 60-80%. Population live more hand to mouth in much higher numbers than the USA, but silent due to pride! Hugh population dependent on benefits for generations.
    At least none own guns and will not start a civil war. 'Carry On', stiff upper lip, poliet at most whisper between themselves.

    Sorry 70 yr old female Idaho hick here by accident, here 25 yrs. I can ? Get back to states and pay $600.+ a month med ins to get ignored there too! Brits do good science and number count, but vital class system w Drs who only follow the specfic rule book. No alternatives. You have money, you get on a plane, go to Eastern EU for a dentist or operation. Everybody else plans their next cheapest possible pkg holiday, That is sacrosanct…..and life goes on. Obviously cranky sorry.

  11. Ivermectin was demonized by the pharmaceuticals because it does not provide them with profits. The media that is funded by the pharmaceuticals went on ad nauseum about how Ivermectin is a horse dewormer and is dangerous for humans (even though it is extremely safe for humans even according to the WHO). Then the media and governments accused those of promoting Ivermectin as disseminating misinformation! Yet several trials (obviously not sponsored by the big pharmaceuticals) showed that Ivermectin had significant efficacy in a large number of patients recovering from COVID-19. (I hope Youtube does not delete my comment).

  12. The safety profile of ivm is unmatched. You would have to take 100x normal doses for negative effects.. not including death. Try taking 20 caps of Tylenol, which is recommended by CDC. Ivm you can err upwards no problem. Flccc for me was 5 pills daily for a week

  13. 11:00 Can we not use the term LatinX?, it is extreamly disrespectful to rewrite someones cultural Identity in order to fit a specific ideology. It is the complete oppisite of "inclusivity". Actual Latinos, native to our countries, don't refer to ourselves as LatinX, our anscestors never did, and it isnt organic. . Imagine If I start to classify your identity with a differnt term, a term that is foreign to you.

    The fact that this is now on actual statistical reports just comes to show that some people can inorganically change language to fit their world view. Its never about the people , and always about the agenda. Spanish will always be a gendered language, Using an X is ridiculous and Disrespectful.

  14. Ivermectin is not effective for just 3 days anyway – it takes at least 2 days to start kicking in and the dosage used abroad is 400 to 600mcg per kg, so, 470 looks more on the lower end.

  15. Since there are many reliable studies showing great benefits of ivermectin, it seems obvious that there is some explanation of discrepancies needed. two factors could this study show the effects it does. One is that obesity is a far more important factor for outcomes than only 3 days of ivm has. And 3 days of ivm is a shorter duration than other effective studies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *