NSA Awards $10B Contract To Amazon, Details Withheld For ‘National Security’

Founder of The Lever, David Sirota, breaks down Amazon’s massive new $10 billion NSA contract.

About Rising:
Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day’s political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day’s political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country’s most important political newsmakers.

Follow Rising on social media:

Website: Hill.TV


Instagram: @HillTVLive

Twitter: @HillTVLive

Written by The Hill

The Hill is the premier source for policy and political news. Follow for tweets on what's happening in Washington, breaking news and retweets of our reporters.


Leave a Reply
  1. Not very mysterious – they're storing every single internet using human's every detail, so if you ever do a thing against CIA goals, they have INSTANT blackmail on you.

    No more heroes, because everyone's compromised. Welcome to the turnkey dictatorship. You should have stopped this at the patriot act.

  2. Surveillance State. Surveillance needs to be done in other jurisdictions other than United States. International Correspondence? Someone at CBS is looking for a promotion!? Hoodoo anticş won't guarantee it. Whatever soul tying it is..and whatever device or means is being used to harass anyone. It affects more than the targeted individual. Your life is set Ivy Leaguer. Stop cause it's showing up in this jurisdiction like Poison Ivy.

  3. COVID-19 Vaccines — A Case of False Advertising

    Now, if the COVID-19 vaccine really isn’t a vaccine, why are they calling it that? While the CDC provides a definition of “vaccine,” the CDC is not the actual law. It’s an agency empowered by the law, but it does not create law itself. Interestingly enough, it’s more difficult to find a legal definition of “vaccine,” but there have been a few cases. Martin provides the following examples:

    Iowa code — “Vaccine means a specially prepared antigen administered to a person for the purpose of providing immunity.” Again, the COVID-19 vaccines make no claim of providing immunity. They are only designed to lessen symptoms if and when you get infected.

    Washington state code — “Vaccine means a preparation of a killed or attenuated living microorganism, or fraction thereof …” Since Moderna and Pfizer are using synthetic RNA, they clearly do not meet this definition.Being a manmade synthetic, the RNA used is not derived from anything that has at one point been alive, be it a whole microorganism or a fraction thereof. The statute continues to specify that a vaccine “upon immunization stimulates immunity that protects us against disease …”

    So, in summary, “vaccine” and “immunity” are well-defined terms that do not match the end points specified in COVID-19 vaccine trials. The primary end point in these trials is: “Prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 disease.” Is that the same as “immunity”? No, it is not.

  4. This admin has done the EXACT opposite of everything they’ve campaigned on. I fear we’ll continue going around the “bipartisan” merry go round until we become the United States of ChEyeNuh ..

  5. Details with held because of national security 10billion contracts ? What it actually means is The government is so bandit and corrupt and untouchable they are printing money no questions asked totally gone Dark 🌑 evil demonic forces are in full control

  6. How the CDC Broke the Law

    The key take-home message Martin delivers in “Plandemic” is that there’s a distinct problem with the CDC’s patent on SARS-CoV isolated from humans, because, by law, naturally occurring DNA segments are prohibited from being patented.
    The law clearly states that such segments are “not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated.” So, either SARS-CoV was manmade, which would render the patent legal, or it’s natural, thus rendering the patent on it illegal.
    However, if the virus was manufactured, then it was created in violation of biological weapons treaties and laws. This includes the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, passed unanimously by both houses of Congress and signed into law by George Bush Sr., which states:4

    “Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section committed by or against a national of the United States.”

    So, as noted by Martin in the documentary, regardless of which scenario turns out to be true, the CDC has broken the law one way or another, either by violating biological weapons laws, or by filing an illegal patent. Even more egregious, May 14, 2007, the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their coronavirus patent confidential.
    Now, because the CDC owns the patent on SARS-CoV, it has control over who has the ability to make inquiries into the coronavirus. Unless authorized, you cannot look at the virus, you cannot measure it or make tests for it, since they own the entire genome and all the rest.

  7. Questions: WHY should anyone vote the way your union voted? HOW would they find out WHAT way you voted? It's a SECRET ballot of a reason. Isn't that cohesion? A form of bullying to get your way? You SHOULD be able to vote ANY WAY YOU WANT.

  8. Well since the Amazon prime increase, worsening service and delivery, if you haven't gotten rid of Amazon now it's the time, all Amazon, Alexa, doorbells, Big Brother is watching

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.