in

NYT Reporter tells O’Keefe he “Absolutely” stands by comments made on undercover video

Pulitzer Prize Winning New York Times Reporter: January 6 Media Coverage ‘Overreaction,’ FBI Involved, Event Was Not Organized Despite Ongoing Narrative

• NYT National Security Correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg, contradicts his own January 6 reporting: “There were a ton of FBI informants among the people who attacked the Capitol.”
• Rosenberg: “It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there [January 6] outside and we were just having fun!”
• Rosenberg: “I know I’m supposed to be traumatized, but like, all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building and are like ‘Oh my God it was so scary!’ I’m like, ‘f*ck off!’”
• Rosenberg: “I’m like come on, it’s not the kind place I can tell someone to man up but I kind of want to be like, ‘dude come on, you were not in any danger.’”
• Rosenberg: “These f*cking little dweebs who keep going on about their trauma. Shut the f*ck up. They’re f*cking b*tches.”
• Rosenberg: “They [media] were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”
• Rosenberg RESPONDS: “Will I stand by those comments? Absolutely.”

[NEW YORK – Mar. 8, 2022] Project Veritas published a bombshell video on Tuesday showing Pulitzer Prize winning New York Times correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg, speaking about the events of January 6, 2021, in a way that contradicts his own reporting.

Rosenberg, who covers national security matters for the Times, says on the undercover video that “there were a ton of FBI informants among the people who attacked the Capitol.”

This revelation is a break from Rosenberg’s reporting on the matter where he characterized such a notion of FBI informants in the crowd as a “reimagining of Jan. 6.”

This was not the only time Rosenberg’s commentary to Project Veritas’ undercover reporter directly contradicted his own published words. Despite telling a Veritas journalist that January 6 was “no big deal,” his article says that downplaying the events of that day was “the next big lie.”

Soundbites of Rosenberg published Tuesday show him saying, “They [media] were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”

Project Veritas founder and CEO James O’Keefe revealed that Rosenberg’s article titled, “The Next Big Lies: Jan 6 was No Big Deal, or A Left-Wing Plot,” was written around the same time as he was making contradictory statements to a Project Veritas undercover reporter.

In the video, Rosenberg also revealed that January 6 was “fun,” a contradiction to his reporting that January 6 was “a violent interruption to the transition of power in American history.”

Rosenberg said, “It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there outside and we were just having fun.”

He even appears to make fun of his New York Times colleagues in one soundbite saying, “I know I’m supposed to be traumatized, but like, all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building, and are like, ‘Oh my God it was so scary!’ I’m like, ‘f*ck off!’” He adds, “I’m like come on, it’s not the kind place I can tell someone to man up but I kind of want to be like, ‘dude come on, you were not in any danger.’”

Rosenberg concludes, “These f*cking little dweebs who keep going on about their trauma. Shut the f*ck up. They’re f*cking b*tches.”

Written by Project Veritas

Project Veritas was founded by James O'Keefe. The mission of Project Veritas is to investigate and expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions in order to achieve a more ethical and transparent society.We will accomplish this by:Launching specific journalistic investigations and widely publicize the results.Conducting training workshops to teach others how to become modern-day muckrakers.Creating a method for the public to alert journalists of issues and institutions that need to be investigated.Project Veritas is a registered 501(c)3 organization. Project Veritas does not advocate specific resolutions to the issues that are raised through its investigations, nor do we encourage others to do so. Our goal is to inform the public of wrongdoing and allow the public to make judgments on the issues.

Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. These "journalists" and their bureaucrat buddies are wholly corrupt. They absolutely know that they are abject liars, and they happily play along along with destructive lies for their own gain. It's good to watch them squirm after all the damage they’ve caused to good people with false accusations and BS stories. Expose them in broad daylight for the maggots that they are, and bring out the salt. No mercy!

  2. 01:12: "would you be willing to sit down with me and speak on the record about this?"

    "no way"

    "why not?"

    "you know"

    Translation: I work for the NY Times. If I tell the truth on the record they'll fire me. 😅

  3. Dude "ducked into" the store. . . . .to call the NSA and CIA for an immediate "exfil." LMAO Funny, how these clowns love to talk shit in bars to some woman their trying to get into their panties, but turn into complete p#$$ies when outside of the bars and no one around to impress. ROSENBERG: CIA? Rescue mission STAT! They have me cornered. I'm taking incoming HEAVY FIRE ROTF.

  4. All of this is leading up to the great tribulation that Jesus spoke of, and then climaxes to Jehovah's great day Armageddon (Matthew24:21 Revelation 16:14-16). Now is the time to reconcile yourselves to our father and creator Jehovah God Almighty (Psalm83:18 Exodus6:3  Revelation 4:11  John17:3).Jehovah (YHWH) God has promised everlasting life on a paradise earth (a new righteous society of people) for all who obey him and his son Jesus Christ (John17:3 Psalm37:9-11,29 Matthew5:5 Matthew 7:21).Give your allegiance to Jehovah's Kingdom (theocratic heavenly government) the one that Jesus told us to pray for, because very soon it's going to destroy Satan's system and all who support it! (Matthew 6:10  Daniel 2:44   Revelation 16:14-16) please read the scriptures.,

  5. It really is exciting to see journalism. Check out the faces he makes when questioned on the serious government stuff. Like he knows, this is not good!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0