Risk of Myocarditis in Young Men “Rare”, but “SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED” – Yup. Viva Clips

Good friend of mine just 'gave in' to the coercion for a job after holding out and swearing 'no to the vaccine'…
(and he's not that "young" either – mid 50's)
1 month ago got his first pfizer 'jab',
today, he's now diagnosed with myocarditis.
Heart rate and blood pressure has been thru the roof the past couple of weeks.
All for a job.
Sad.

"Rare" but "significantly increased". Hello Doublespeak. What if anything is the legal definition of "rare".

Dude, you know the risk of seizure for the MMRV is 1 in 400, right? That's supposedly rare, but we're still giving 1 year olds MMRV. This is typical pharmaceutical math. That's why no vaccine should ever be mandated for any reason.

I'd be willing to bet that if this caused a 1 in 4000 chance of even getting a hang nail in young women it would gain some traction.

My truth is that the vaccine causes myocarditis.

Gotta love all that actual data followed by the completely unsubstantiated rhetoric right at the end

You should check out the US militarys medical report on adverse reactions in healthly service members after getting the 'jab'. Scary

This is about depopulation

1 in a million is rare, 1 in a few thousand is a problem… 1 in a few hundred caused V in the past to be removed and deemed dangerous… Does not make sense until you realize the "problems we were warning against" is the V working as intended… Billions of doses were not "manufactured" in under a year but were starting to be manufactured around 2018 IMO preparing for the scheduled release to fix elections and to remove all but the compliant in certain areas e.g police,military,etc…

Significant just means statistically significant; more than the calculated margin of error. Rare also has a specific meaning in statistics, though I think that term can be domain specific even within stats. But I think it is 3 standard deviations from the mean.

3:04 "significant" doesn't mean "big" when talking statistics, it means "with relatively strong evidence". There's two factors at play, the "how much?" which they say is small and "How sure are you?" they say "significantly sure". Granted, standards of significance have been criminally lax in lots of studies, but I'm not sure how they determined that here.

Educate yourself in narcissism and cluster b personality, thoroughly, and perhaps once enough people are trained in spotting these demons, we can drag society back from the narcissistic left who’ve got a taste for power and won’t give it up. Too much 1984 in here, we gotta do something about it.

The more relevant statistic is the myocarditis in players in the NFL or even professional sports.

Why aren’t these journalists being prosecuted?

Climate Barbie: if you say it loud enough and long enough, they actually believe you.

Paraphrasing, of course.