Robby Soave: MSM ADMITS Russiagate Twitter Interference Had NO EFFECT On 2016 Election

Robby Soave elaborates on the finding that Russian interference via Twitter had little impact on the 2016 election. #misinformation #russiagate #2016

About Rising:
Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day’s political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day’s political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country’s most important political newsmakers.

Follow Rising on social media:

Website: Hill.TV


Instagram: @HillTVLive

Twitter: @HillTVLive

Written by The Hill

The Hill is the premier source for policy and political news. Follow for tweets on what's happening in Washington, breaking news and retweets of our reporters.


Leave a Reply
  1. ROBBIE, now complete the report, the left focused on Russia because consultants told Hillary in her pre-Run that Russia was her weakest link from the Publix’s perception,…said differently, accuse others what you do yourself, Hillary and Uranium One = turned into RussiaGate to get the bright light off her and onto Trump.

  2. I always found it wild that they think if you see a meme or hear "misinformation" you somehow automatically get hypnotized and the mere exposure to it trapped your mind. I know they didn't teach us this in school but it's called critical thinking 😂.

  3. Funny how the Liberals, MSM media, and the Federal Law Enforcement are all guilty of doing what they have been accusing Trump, his base, and Putin of doing. These past few years have proved to be a great example of projection.

  4. As non twitter user, the only time I hear how important twitter is, are news stories saying how important it is. How I've made it this far in life without twitter is something of a miracle.

  5. BJG: 3% of Americans are on Twitter

    Pew: 23% of Americans are on Twitter

    Maybe the hosts should prepare, and Rising should have fact checking.

  6. Everyone who pushed the Russiagate nonsense was an 'election denier', 'challenging the integrity of the election', etc. Now these hypocrites toss around the term 'election deniers' against others.

  7. Russian Gate < Progressive bias worth hundreds of millions, FBI meddling in the election, mail in ballot with dirty voter rolls, ballot harvesting, "non profits" that work to improve democrat turnout (zuckerberg), big tech suppression/shadow banning/censorship.


  8. Progressive types who were enraged about Russiagate don’t want to admit their complicity in greasing the wheels for this Ukraine war.

    It’s hilarious how badly these progressives have ended up on the wrong side of history (w Russia, the pandemic, defund the police, etc). Especially considering how their main motivation is to be on the right side of history. It’s too much for them to take accountability so they double-down to infinity.

  9. By the time the lie is "discovered" the damage is already done.

    "Discovered" because the truth has been known since 2016. There were only 150k posts, which is nothing next to the billions of other posts.

    We didn't need to do anything but use our brains and retain the ability to speak freely, but we were censored instead. Power corrupts. Power is abused. The answer is to protect the freedoms, rights, and power of the individual so that powerful groups can't simply silence them and must instead engage with them.

  10. Anyone else confused as to why they're only looking at this from a "well I guess this disproves the narrative" perspective, but don't then address the obvious counterpoint to that, which is "what narrative does this line up with". You have to ask the question, if this information was overwhelmingly hitting a single demographic, then you'd have pretty good justification thinking that may be intentional.

    If you look at the story as misleading information being purposely fed to a specific republican demographic, it's a far more interesting potential story to ask "to what end?"

  11. And people are supposed to take the news seriously. Washington post covered this 6 years later. Just like Hunters laptop, real reporters could figure this stuff out in a day or 2. Takes them 3 years for that one. I figured it was bogus when they didn't even show the amazing memes they put out that swayed the election. Let alone stats they had to have of the number of views. Or views compared to the rest of the endless political BS memes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *