in

The Quiet Part Out Loud

In this clip from Part Of The Problem # 877 ( https://youtu.be/oQ96yu3W-pc ) Dave and Robbie react to Morning Joe saying the stuff they aren’t supposed to.

Twitter:

https://twitter.com/ComicDaveSmith

https://www.instagram.com/bmackayisright

Instagram:

https://www.instagram.com/theproblemd

https://www.instagram.com/bmackayisright

Subscribe On YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/DSmithcomic

Buy Daves Album : Dave Smith Libertas – https://bit.ly/2Nq5seM

Dave Smith and Robbie The Fire Bernstein bring you the latest in Politics three times a week, with the promise of bonus episodes! Libertarian Philosophy mixed with a sense of humor, POTP is one of the leading voices in libertarianism.

Dave Smith is a New York based stand-up comedian, radio personality, and political commentator. Dave can be seen regularly on “The Greg Gutfeld Show” and “Red Eye” on Fox News, as well as “Kennedy” on Fox Business Network. In 2013 Dave was featured as one of the New Faces at the prestigious Just For Laughs Comedy Festival in Montreal. He was also a featured performer on the New York Comedy Festival’s “New York’s Funniest” showcase in 2014 and 2015. Dave’s outlet for his social commentary is his podcast, “Part of the Problem,” which is available on iTunes. Dave is also co-host of “The Legion of Skanks” podcast, available on the GaS Digital Network.

Written by Dave Smith

Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. Listen, murdering families and children with drone strikes is just part of the job. We cant hold people accountable for committing crimes while working. Just ask the cops.

  2. I love that 'drone strikes on American citizens' is immediately justified as 'cherry picking'.

    yeah, ANYONE could be made to look bad if you just cherry pick those times they commit illegal mass murder against the people they're elected to protect.

  3. The white house some years ago:

    Agent: "so Mr president, now that you are elected what secrets do you want to know ?"

    Nobel peace price winning hero: "Bomb em"

    Agent: "Wait, you want to do wha-"

    Nobel peace price winning hero: "Friggin bomb em until they roasted"

  4. Absolutely amazing all the presidents beforehand were fucking war criminals but because he challenged the results of the election like maybe I don’t know Al Gore perhaps, that he is beyond the pale of war criminals

  5. I cannot and will not support any trump prosecution until the bushes, the cheneys, the Clinton’s, and Obama plus their admins are all in prison and being tortured under Guantanamo. Then, and only then will I support a trump prosecution. But until then, he’s got my vote

  6. Joe Scarborough always defends his former tribe. always.

    reagan's neoliberalism and destruction of public airwaves are the biggest crimes on humanity in my 67 years on this planet. and scarborough defends it.

    i watched (as a radio/tv reporter in the 80's/90's) the reagan corporatization of our formerly locally owned airwaves and the abolishment of the fairness doctrine turn news into propaganda in a short period time. i left the media in 1994 and it was bad then….

    NOW? what a fucking mess of misinformation, disinformation, and trump's 30,000 lies

    goodbye america….

    loving Ecuador!!!

  7. LOL All of y’all better lawyer up.
    I’m talking about you Pelosi, Shift, both Bidens and the rest of all them crooks!
    You too Mitch McConnell and the other DUMBS#IT’s like Liz “I hate Trump” Cheney!
    The difference this time, everyone of you will have a fair trial.

  8. Okay, F Trump and all, but how do you list specific felonies and war crimes of various Presidents, then call your own list "cherrypicking"?? Yeah, you're just cherrypicking Jeffrey Dahmers murders…I mean if you total the moments of his life, those murders and cannibalism would be a tiny fraction of a percent of his total moments alive…so we're just cherrypicking on old Jeffrey, right?????

    FFS…

  9. I'm just continually frustrated that no one is willing to admit that disagreeing on what the results are is not the same as disagreeing with the election *itself*. Like, sure argue about who is right and why, but you can't say that someone who wants to use vote totals to win is trying to destroy the election. Rightly or wrongly Trump disagrees about what the totals were, and with the decision to go ahead with the announced results rather than investigating to his satisfaction. Regardless of whether you have any sympathy for that point of view, it's disingenuous and stupid to say that it is the same as wanting to get rid of elections as the means of choosing officials.

  10. It’s ALWAYS different with the leftists Trump Jr had a meeting that Congress needed to get to the bottom of! But Hunter Biden filling his pockets with foreign money… move along nothing to see here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Loading…

0