in

UK Protected PRINCE ANDREW From Jeffrey Epstein’s Investigators: Prosecutor

Authorities in the United Kingdom allegedly protected Prince Andrew from American investigators’ probe into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking crimes. This is according to a new book written by the prosecutor who led the case. #PrinceAndrew #JeffreyEpstein #unitedkingdom

About Rising:
Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day’s political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day’s political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country’s most important political newsmakers.

Follow Rising on social media:

Website: Hill.TV

Facebook: facebook.com/HillTVLive/

Instagram: @HillTVLive

Twitter: @HillTVLive

Written by The Hill

The Hill is the premier source for policy and political news. Follow for tweets on what's happening in Washington, breaking news and retweets of our reporters.

Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. Its not Andrew the British state is primarily concerned about, or covering up for. At all costs, they want to preserve the monarcy. As shown by the protests, a significant minority of Britians want a end to that institution. If a king is imposed on them without their consent; they don't have a vote in who is seated in the House of Lords, what have you got? Some might call Britian a democracy. By all the dictionaries I have ever seen, Britian does fit any of their definitions.

  2. THE HILL
    You are living in a GLASS HOUSE………….Don't throw STONES at the British.
    HUNTER BIDEN…..Isn't he PROTECTED completely ? FBI, DOJ, IRS …every outfit is COMPLICIT in cover up,.
    52 IDIOTS …..certified that the INFAMOUS LAPTOP, is Russian Disinfo !! Go eat your " BREAKFAST TACO" !! haha

  3. Coverup deleting Hand on Eugene backside!!!!!!What's wrong with Andrew? I can't even call him Prince. He doesn't deserve that title. Did he just deliberately brush his hand on Eugenia's backside from the top all the way down? And almost paused at the bump? This guy belongs in jail. Why would he do such a thing in front of the cameras. What does he do when no one is watching?

  4. "The American press isn't so supportive of celebrities…"

    LOLWUT!?!

    Mainstream US press ABSOLUTELY protect celebrities, politicians and other powerful people. Where have you been?

  5. What about ALL DEE'S MUM'S GOWWIN INDA LAYBOR OVA AT DA LAYBOR PARTY 🤣 HAULERING Prince Andrew"ANDREW"ANDREW" WERE ANY OF DEE'S MUM'S OVA AT EPPSTEIN ISLAND 🧐🤔🙄🤣

  6. Why are they always protecting Andrew? I can't even call him Prince. He doesn't deserve that title. Did he just deliberately brush his hand on Eugenia's backside from the top all the way down during the walkabout? And slightly paused at the bump? This guy belongs in jail. Why would he do such a thing in front of the cameras. What does he do when no one is watching?

  7. Bri using Diana’s name is the same sentence as Megan markle shows how little she actually knows. Everyone loved Diana because of her humanitarianism. No one likes Megan because she’s a D class actress who is trying to climb the ladder crying about baseless race claims

  8. if happens that Andrew of Britain will get investigated maybe there's too many demokrat party will be mentioned and will get involved..
    even the Britain or UK are suppressing the Law🛡️and Justice⚖️.. where is the quote 'No One is Above the Law🛡️and Justice⚖️'?..

  9. If the Queen really wanted to leave a good legacy behind, instead of simply stripping Andrew of his titles, she should have reopened the London Tower prison and stuck Andrew in a cell for the remainder of his life.

  10. About ten years back a young lad in England was run down by an American woman who drove off leaving him to die. The woman then drove home, packed her bags and got on the first flight back to the US, her husband worked in the US embassy. The UK has repeatedly asked for the extradition of this paragon of human virtue and been turned down. Not only that, her husband's diplomatic immunity was then mysteriously extended to her also (she didn't have it before the incident).
    The case has been widely publicised in the UK, and the general attitude of the British population recently to American demands for extradition of UK citizens to the US is that the Yanks can go and f*** themselves! I think America needs to relearn the old adage: people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

  11. Another video where the research is lacking. If you talk about Britain and royals you need to read English law on the matter. Yes American prosecutors were given the cold shoulder. The Brits were following their own laws. Why is Rising assuming that England should follow American law? And to be perfectly honest,, does anyone remember the wife of an American working in England who killed a guy because she drove on the wrong side of the road. She rushed back to the US and the US claimed she had diplomatic immunity. You reap what you sow kids.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0