Dr. John Campbell
Green book, JCVI advises that breastfeeding women should be offered any suitable COVID-19 vaccine.
(Updated, 17th August, 2022)
Summary of the Public Assessment Report. For covid-19 vaccine, Pfizer/BioNTec
Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated.
(Updated, 16th August, 2022)
Summary of the Public Assessment Report
Authorisation for Temporary Supply, COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 (BNT162b2 RNA) concentrate for solution for injection
Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), Pfizer Limited & BioNTech Manufacturing, GmbH
Updated, 16th August, 2022
Reproductive and developmental toxicity
Fertility and early embryonic development and embryofoetal development
A combined fertility and developmental study (including teratogenicity and postnatal investigations) in rats is ongoing.
Prenatal and postnatal development, including maternal function
No such studies have been done.
Studies in which the offspring (juvenile animals) are dosed and/or further evaluated
No such studies have been done.
Local tolerance
No such studies have been done.
The assessments made as part of the general toxicity study should suffice and a separate study is not needed.
Other toxicity studies
No such studies have been done.
Toxicity conclusions
The absence of reproductive toxicity data is a reflection of the speed of development to first identify and select COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 for clinical testing and its rapid development to meet the ongoing urgent health need.
In principle, a decision on licensing a vaccine could be taken in these circumstances without data from reproductive toxicity studies animals,
but there are studies ongoing and these will be provided when available.
In the context of supply under Regulation 174,
it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time:
however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported,
provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination.
Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated.
Green book, updated 17th August 2022
Specific population groups
Pregnancy
There is no known risk associated with giving inactivated, recombinant viral or bacterial vaccines or toxoids during pregnancy or whilst breastfeeding (Kroger et al, 2013).
Developmental and reproductivity testing of the Pfizer BioNTech, Moderna and AstraZeneca vaccines in animals have not raised any concerns.
JCVI has therefore advised that women who are pregnant should be recommended to receive primary immunisation,
and that pregnancy is considered a clinical risk group for the autumn booster programme.
Routine questioning about last menstrual period and/or pregnancy testing is not required before offering the vaccine.
Surveillance of the inadvertent administration of COVID-19 vaccines in early pregnancy is being conducted for the UK by the UK Health Security Agency Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, to whom such cases should be reported.1
This surveillance is being undertaken to document safety in women who unknowingly receive a vaccine in early pregnancy
Breastfeeding
There is no known risk associated with being given a non-live vaccine whilst breastfeeding.
JCVI advises that breastfeeding women should be offered any suitable COVID-19 vaccine.
Guidelines – CPS cannot prosecute.
Rules – CPS cannot prosecute.
Law – CPS can prosecute then only if it's financially viable to their budget.
Remember the two girls out for a walk in Derbyshire drinking take-away coffee and the Police chose to 'nick' them ?
Just a short while later Police must have got told by the CPS that these two have not broken the law so apologised to them.
Try getting them to turn up when your home is burgled
Great analysis. Appauling … expected nothing less from the establishment .. totally conflicting guidance over a critical issue … Spreading more confusion ….. Oh ! … was that the intention?
This reminds me of the movie Brazil,
So whatever the guidelines say..follow them and DO AS YOUR TOLD!!! and people do exactly that..no matter the outcome! So simple simon says lets jump off a cliff…well F that!!
Thank you for your observations at this time. Sadly I have reached a point where the statements of Government and Health related,Environmental or of any other area of importance carry ZERO credibility. The ones pulling the strings have no scruples,empathy or desire to do good. The BBC and all the other outlets of media,no more than agents of propaganda…what sad times for humanity.
Thanks Dr Campbell.. You are a champion!. I just hope and pray the YouTube "police" (or the woke UK police) don't cancel you because you are one of the few safe and sensible commentators in a wilderness of lies and deception. Bless you!
Words are important. The JCVI statement says "offered" which implies a choice, the MHPRA say "not". There is a difference.
In my view the wording used by governments & their agencies one of their major weapons against us.
Is this still a conversation? The 4th dose aka 2nd Booster was encouraged months ago and I can only assume has since 'worn off' like the dismal doses before it…What are we up to? 5 or 6?
Is it still an experimental vaccine?
Who is responsible for this Green Book? They should be questioned and hold to account!
I don’t know if it’s your training and wanting to believe in the system you have spent your life time in, but it won’t be long before you eventually join all the dots and realise that NO one should have been given this toxic poison!
I can't believe anyone still wants to have this dangerous and largely untested vaccine, another concern is people that are having the new shot will spreading covid around more than it would have done naturally.
We couldn't even take aspirin back in the day….. what is wrong with these women? Will they jump off a bridge if someone tells them too? It's YOUR job to protect your baby, say no to the poison. We have all seen the side effects now, is your job really worth your baby's life or moronic family members who thrive on division?
Your considered analysis of the available official data is a godsend. You have two and a half million followers…I wish it were more like 60 million! The truth hides in plain sight, but most people do not have the self confidence to trust their own eyes. What you are doing is joining the dots for a disempowered nation.
Governments worldwide are coming down on the back of the hoaxes that are being played on all,.so speak now John or run for the hills fella, all you have done is recommend the jabs 18 months ago, and you could actually use coded language as others have on this channel to get the truth out,…if you read from corrupt sites such as the WHO, or WEF, OR PHE, then all you are doing is recommending genocide in this instance……..Would be a great start if we actually had an isolate of the said sars cov 2 to start with but hey that's just me being picky.
This organization doesn't care about the victims just more money
Two rats were in a bar. One said to the other: "have you had your Covid vax yet?" The other said: "No, I'm waiting for the human trials to be done".
NO V FOR MEEEE
if that's a vaccine then my left nut is a chocolate eclair
They manipulate with data😱😱😱
Sounds like boris has gone in and told them this is the government guide lines started giving his advice again…. so mixed up and untrusting.
It's a funny old world
Where we have AI Systems
That can Predict
Far better on the outcome
And yet
Scienctists continue
To experiment
With Mice
For the outcome
With drug's
That they feed us
Yet they know it's wrong
Money talks
MORALS ethics commonsense
Are classed as bullshit
They walk
COZ if they used AI Systems
Not mice
For the drugs they produce
Their gonna lose profits
You see nearly all their drugs
Comes with a free side effect
And they have a pill for that
Yet they know
These mice they use
Are not geneticly Normal
Thousands and thousands
Of generations
Grown in warehouses
Sent to Labs
And not one is geneticly Nomal
They know this
Its Their
Little Secret
That's why
There are so many
Side effects
@Dr Mr John Campbell I Dont Care About Your Stupid 1ST Global World Epidemic Pandemic COVID20 CoronaVirus Vaccinations Guidelines
I appreciate your ability to find these data: Many of us are not!
The government aren't advising against it. John is wrong.
An organization that denies adverse reactions should not be trusted to recommend anything
Dr John. Read Pandemic Risk (2014) by Olga Jonas from the World Bank. Eye opening.
The corrupt left hand does not know what the stupid right hand is doing!
8.21 the Pfizer and Moderrna shots are completely different class of "vaccine", never before approved for use in humans and still under emergency use authorization. That paragraph is completely irrelevant given that most people are being coerced into getting those shots now.
Simple again.
They are using the ladies as testers again.
You decide.
Green paper using OLD DATA 2013. COME OFF IT.
MAKES NO SENSE.
Don’t take the Kool Aid
And we are supposed to trust these loons?
Many chose to cut the unvaccinated out of family and social circles. It’s amazing to think that I’d still have certain people in my life if I’d:
1. Pretended to be vaccinated
2. Pretended to follow the rules
3. Wore a mask and pretended it worked
4. Pretended that me, my wife and children were all scared of a virus
5. Sanitised my hands every 5 minutes
WOW! Talk about the left side of the brain not knowing what the right side is wanting. How surprising. That's what happens, when people get caught up, in their own lies.
🙋♀️🇦🇺
Are these people idiots, are they corrupt, is Pfizer paying them? Are they just lazy, who are they giving this contradictory and inadequate information to the public?
Follow the science the government said. What they really meant was follow their science or whatever cockamamie rubbish they come up with. Does this not also show that the likes of WHO and other Global bodies are not to be trusted and are under control by outside sources