in

Vaccine Efficacy in High Risk Individuals A Study from UK

Vaccine Efficacy in High Risk Individuals A Study from UK

A preprint study from UK demonstrates that the vaccine efficacy in high risk group is not reduced except in immunocompromised. Let’s review this data.

Buy me a coffee 🙂 https://www.buymeacoffee.com/DrMobeenSyed
Become my patron: https://www.patreon.com/mobeensyed?fan_landing=true
Looking to support my educational work? Donate here: https://paypal.me/mobeensyed?locale.x=en_US

Link to the preprint PDF:
https://khub.net/documents/135939561/430986542/RCGP+VE+riskgroups+paper.pdf/a6b54cd9-419d-9b63-e2bf-5dc796f5a91f

Disclaimer:
This video is not intended to provide assessment, diagnosis, treatment, or medical advice; it also does not constitute provision of healthcare services. The content provided in this video is for informational and educational purposes only.
Please consult with a physician or healthcare professional regarding any medical or mental health related diagnosis or treatment. No information in this video should ever be considered as a substitute for advice from a healthcare professional.

#drbeen #koolbeens #COVID

Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. I am still confused. I just want to know that if you are already being treated for clotting risk, due to atherosclerosis and PVD, as well as chronic inflammation from ileostomy side effects, why would they risk a vaccine, that you said can cause clotting and inflammation? I am sticking with IVM and the general safety protocol, as well as the vitamins/minerals mentioned. Somebody, in the know, please respond.

  2. God help anyone who doesn't take the vaccine now in Australia, the Premier of the state of Victoria, Dan Andrews is planning on refusing any medical assistance of any type if you do not get vaccinated, and some Doctors here are already discussing this as an option apparently. 😱

  3. Around the LOVE IT in the mechanism of THESE MRNA you go a lot.
    BUT AS PATIENTS WE ARE INTERESTED TO HEAL OURSELVES WITH THE SIMPLIEST FORECASTABLE DRUG OR PHARMA THAT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM CAN OFFER

    THEREFORE IT DOESN T MEAN A THING IF MRNA VACCINES CONCEPTUALLY ARE BEAUTYFUL
    WE CARE ONLY TO HEAL OURSELVES AND AS TAX PAYERS TO DO IT WITH THE LOWEST COSTS

  4. 99% or 100%
    Are u kidding us…DISOHNESTY AT HIS TOP HEIGHT

    Efficacy against a PLACEBO IS SUCH A DUMB THING..response in which PERCENTAGE 🤔😐😐and FOR HOW long?
    THE RESEARCHERS MUST COMPARE VACCINES WITH COMPETITIVE DRUGS
    AND ASKING THEMESELVES..IS FAR BETTER THAN THIS LOW COST PRODUCT OR IS IT ALMOST THE SAME OR IS IT WORSE?

  5. WHAT A LOAD OF NONSENSE. SO IN THE UK MOST PEOPLE OVER 65 HAVE COMORBIDITY …………. DON'T BELIEVE THE NONSENSE THAT PASSES THROUGH THE NHS HERE IN THE UK. I LIVE HERE AND YOU CAN'T EVEN MAKE AN APPOINTMENT TO SEE YOUR DOCTOR. ALL THE DATA IS MASSAGED. AND YES I HAVE SEEN A LOT OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION DATA FROM NHS HOSPITALS AND THEY ARE NOT REPORTING THE TRUTH.

  6. Dr Been, would you be able to examine IVM and possible resistance if taken regularly. I use IVM on my horses and have heard of resistance issues when used as a wormer. However, it could also be the fact that IVM is cheap and there are moderner, more expensive wormers now available!!

  7. This report has been tailored to prove mRNA efficacy only. It does not prove that it works as an effective treatment. It makes assumptions that the selective criteria are the only valid ones. All is based on faulty PCR tests that are proven ineffective at determining if the FULL LIVE virus is present. If they used an effective diagnostic test to determine virus presence it would have value, without it there is none.

  8. It's just as good as nothing .It doesn't worth discussing quote " Further research is needed to

    understand vaccine effectiveness against severe disease among immunosuppressed groups. "

  9. I've been vaccinated, and I am back to wearing true N95 masks when I am in public. I finally found some true N95 masks at Home Depot. And I avoid spending much time indoors with strangers as much as possible. I go very early to the grocery store or other stores when they first open and try to get in and out of the store as quickly as possible to reduce exposure to Delta.

  10. If I were to buy a brand new car and the dealer would say "We guarantee that it will definitely drive fine for 10 days" I'd hand the keys back and laugh my way to some other dealer. My body is a much more serious matter. I understand this is the data we have, and we should want the outcomes this suggests, but this leaves so many questions unanswered.

  11. I see a lot of people that have died with Moderna jabs in Japan, many different lots involved. I don't blame the jab as much as the manufacturing plant that did them. None of the lots were made or given in the US.

  12. I have Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Athsma, Lyme Disease, AV Heart Block. I had both vaccines -Moderna. April 7, 2021. In July I had Antibodies for SARS Cov 2. Doctor's nurse said the antibodies were from the vaccine, not infection.

  13. I have Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Athsma, Lyme Disease, AV Heart Block. I had both vaccines -Moderna. April 7, 2021. In July I had Antibodies for SARS Cov 2. Doctor's nurse said the antibodies were from the vaccine, not infection.

  14. Right, this is all about S-protein antibodies, against the spike from early 2020. What does that say about the chance you will be hospitalised for instance? It's not really saying a lot this study I think.

  15. “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand." Ephesians 6:12-13 kjv

  16. Dr Been, will you be taking the vaccine after your many interviews and research on studies done, as well as the controversial studies on treatments using ivermectin, statins and steroids along with zinc, vit D ect.
    If you do have the vaccine which would you recommend for 60 and over in Australia.??
    Love your work, your ethics and your impartialness while covering all bases of this virus.

  17. I thought having this disease was as a result of my old age, while I was diagnosed of heart disease Dec. 19 2020, I used series of medication but I was still having the severe pain, until I used an herbal mixture from Dr. Gbenga which I saw on YouTube and I was completely cured, I appreciate Dr. Gbenga for his help

  18. Question: could someone kindly explain please, as there's a bit which I don't understand. It relates to the table showing Specific risk groups, approx 16 minutes into the video:

    The table compares pairs, e.g. Chronic Liver:no vs. chronic liver:yes, also diabetes:no vs. diabetes:yes. The part that I don't understand is why are the Chronic Liver:No group different in size to the diabetes:no group? I would have expected that if people are not in an At Risk group, they would be the same number and percentage, but the table shows that there are 93% people not at risk for the chronic liver pair, whereas there equivalent percentage for the diabetes pair is 94%. Surely if the people are not in an At risk group, they are not at risk to anything, and should therefore be the same number for all pairs?

    The alternative interpretation is that the table only looks at people who are at risk of some one condition or more than one condition. For example the Diabetes:no group might include people who are not at risk of diabetes, but are at risk of chronic liver disease. But then, that poses another question:- the percentages who are not at risk from some particular category are very close in number, ranging from 93% to 95%, which strikes me as very odd. I would have expected that there would be a much much higher number of people who are at risk of diabetes, therefore the at risk group who are NOT at risk of diabetes should be a lot smaller than say a group who are not at risk of a relatively infrequent condition, such as morbid obesity. And yet, the numbers are very similar: 1450 and 1286 respectively.

    Can someone explain please? I'm getting a bit confused here as to what's being compared to what.

  19. Are we not studying this in the United States? We have 8-9 months of vaccine data where’s that at? Everything is England or Israel. Did all the scientists get fired for not being vaccinated?

  20. The covid19 Therapeutic answer

    Aviptadil/Zyesami, a natural peptide stops the replication of the Covid virus and all variants, including the delta & lambda & mu mutations.

    Stops the cytokine storm. Patients with respiratory failure get out of the hospital 11 days earlier.

    The FDA received the Aviptadil/Zyesami EUA (emergency use authorization) application 103 days ago.

    NeuroRX and Relief Therapeutics

  21. Isn't an immune response simply an inflammatory response? Isn't that quite easy inspire? Do these "efficacy" results mean they surmounted Covid or Delta,or does it mean that they were showing a significant fight?

  22. So…does the vaccine actually have efficacy or are they actually measuring whatever natural immunity people had in the first place? The original publication put out by Pfizer and Moderna only had the vaccine 1% more effective than the placebo. The "science" on these vaccines is suspect, at best.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0